Posts by gurabli

    Thanks for all of you! Managed to install Pure2 image.

    Which version would you recommend? Latest?

    For some reason it doesn't work with my CI+ card. Just black screen on many channels. It is a local DVB-C cable provider.

    Can I somehow add some logs and somebody could check if any error is displayed?

    Thanks, I'll check it once family gets off the TV :)

    I have a CI+ card from my cable provider and I read that Pure2 is the image to go with, as ATV or Egami doesn't really work, don't open most of the channels (Echolite module is not paired with device, works on every TV I put inside).

    I hope Pure2 will work.

    Hi,

    I have Zgemma H7S, 3 images installed, OATV and Egami. I would like to install Pure2 on slot 4. With online image selector there is no Pure2.

    How can I flash a Pure2 image to slot 4? From OpenATV 7.3 or 7.4? There is no option to select local image.

    Thanks!

    Hi!

    Just got a Zgemma H7S box. I want to use it to watch the DVB-C stream of my cable provider who gives CI+ modul Echolite with Irdeto inside. On TV it works perfectly fine. Can switch the module between two TVs.

    Running a december release of OpenATV 7.4 with latest version of ciplushelper plugin from feed.

    When I insert the CI+ module, it is recognized, have the menu with options. But no matter what I do it gives me the message CI+ Authentication ongoing... And nothing happens, can't open any channel. Provider is a Serbian called Stcable - Sattrak.

    Any idea what can and should I try? Maybe an Egami image?

    20241226_222006.jpg

    Interesting, I'll give Tailscale a try and read in more depth.

    Is it based on Wireguard protocol? Compared to speed with simple WG to WG setup?


    Once the connection is established the remote device (in this case the Enigma2 receiver) and my home server will see each other as if they are on same local network? (Remote) streaming also works?

    Is it based on Wireguard protocol?
    Yes

    Everything works and quickly, as if it were working locally.

    I tried Tailscale - the Remote node (Linux server) where the Enigma2 is located in local network was configured as subnet - so I had access to box without running Tailscale on box. Actually it workes really nice. First ping (the one crates the tunnel) is higher, but then it defaults to avarage ping and speed I have with plain WG.

    I returned to have plain WG site-to-site between two servers on router level (easier, as no routing is required).


    Once you have the Tailscale plugin for E2 ready it would be a nice addition - as in that case it is very simple to connect to only E2 box.

    Just thinking out aloud now: if I have a Linux server at both A and B location, then I can configure Tailscale on these two nodes and I have access to all the devices on both location's local network? Or it must run on the Enigma2 device too?

    Interesting, I'll give Tailscale a try and read in more depth.

    Is it based on Wireguard protocol? Compared to speed with simple WG to WG setup?


    Once the connection is established the remote device (in this case the Enigma2 receiver) and my home server will see each other as if they are on same local network? (Remote) streaming also works?

    Looks really interesting. Didn't use tailscale yet.

    Could you explain in bit more detail how will this work?

    Basically, I want to have access to a remote enigma2 box via a Wireguard tunnel, from my local LAN.

    I run a Linux server at home, everything in Docker.

    I wonder if I can configure Wireguard with this plugin to connect to my own remote Wireguard server and to be able to access the Zgemma H7S box from my remote location (LAN to LAN, I guess).

    So that I can access Openwebif from my remote location with the box IP?

    Hi,

    my cable provider uses DVB-C and gives CI+ modules for decoding. All I know is a CI+ module with Irdeto. It works perfetcly fine with all CI+ capable TV's.

    Is there a budget E2 box option that I could buy and the CI+ card would work?

    Thanks!

    Hi!


    I had a DM500, and now I need a HD box. Do not need any extra features, just to be able to watch HD channels too and HDMI connection. I see the very attractive prices of Amiko mini boxes, and now I do not know which one should I get.


    What are the main differences in Mini HD, Mini HD SE, and Micro HD?


    I have a reliable c-line (cccam). All I need is a reliable stb, that can handle well the cline, and to be able to use it simply (my parents will use it).
    The price of the Micro HD is the lowest, therefore I'm thinking to get this unit, if you say I'm good with that, and I do not need HD Mini or HD Mini SE. I dont need the display, other tuner except DVB-S2, and other functions.


    Do I have any limitations with the Micro HD or it is better to go with HD Mini/SE?


    Can I make bouquets like channel list like on DM500? I mean, to have favorites like News, Sports, Documentary, etc?
    Am I able to edit the channel list from PC?


    Many thanks and looking forward to your help!