Thank you so much for your help. The extra protection for the HD channels is nano1, which is almost impossible for a standard reader to handle. The Atlas receiver is an algerian box with many reular updates and yes, it can handle the nano1 issue. CSP will help?? I reckon it will and I can resolve the issue on my own without further help. CSP is a proxy server and will not handle nano1 but, bypass it. Hummm, think so.
Regards
Michael
Hi there,
I am having problem decrypting Canalsat Fr HD channels on Smargo and Oscam. I can decrypt and share the sd channels but, not the HD ones. Any one out there have the same problem with Canalsat Fr HD channels or, does any one have a solution for this problem.
Regards
Michael
Hi there,
I am having problem decrypting Canalsat Fr HD channels on Smargo and Oscam. I can decrypt and share the sd channels but, not the HD ones. Any one out there have the same problem with Canalsat Fr HD channels or, does any one have a solution for this problem.
Regards
Michael
Hi,
I have managed to install OScam and CCcam on 64 bit Linux machine and configured every security feature in order, to secure my server against potential threat while connected to the public internet. However, I did realise the potential threat from different sources mainly, server location and unknown EMM. Therefore, after researching further, I did find CSP a good solution, and downloaded it from its source. A bit confused about the possibility of the following configuration. Oscam to read the cards, CSP to cache, protect , and act as a proxy, and CCcam to act as server for the clients. Hence,
Oscam read card (backend)===> CSP (middleware) ===> CCcam(Front end)==>public internet==> share to clients.
I did not reasearch CSP yet, but, I do dreckon its possible to have such a solid configuration. Has any one tried out such a configuration and what was the outcome? I do not want to know your config rather, find out the potential of such a configuration.
Regards
