Posts by Fenix11

    Feel free to share! My d9865 arrives tomorrow.


    How hard is the flash to dump?

    I tried it with the Urjtag and STMicro tools, but I don't know how to do it, so I had to remove the memory and read it with Xgecu. To attach it to the receiver, I had to make a homemade removable socket. It sounds crazy, but it worked for me. Honestly, it blows my mind, and I'm putting it into practice without fear of failure. These photos will show what a mad scientist I am. 😅I should be working at NASA.

    You spoke to me in an algorithmic way😅, I don't know how to handle those methods yet, but if you know how to do it I can share them with you.

    Hello, greetings.
    Seeing these interesting topics, I've also researched and explored this new system. I've noticed some interesting changes in both the bit data flow and the software.
    I've been analyzing some details of the equipment software, comparing the x.90 version and the recent x.92 version. I've noticed that they've removed, modified, and added features to this software that I'm not very familiar with, but at a glance, it's clear that they relate to the flow and management of key data.
    In one of the images, comparing both software versions, you can see that they've removed some features related to the EMM, ECM, and CW values, adding features and improvements to the ECM flow. You can also see changes in the vfprintf values, from %10d to %10llu. Changes can also be seen in the OS21 tasks. In the Oscam emulator, you can see that in the different PowerVu modes of some MUXes, the security bit and nano values change, as does the length of the section in the ECM packet stream. Something curious and new to me is that in the image of the FOX News channel's bit stream, the ID tables 80 and 81 change these values. I don't know if it's an emulator error, but it looks strange.
    My conclusion is that these bit changes can affect CW calculations.
    I will continue to explore more closely to see what else is discovered. If anyone needs any of the information or software, I can share it.
    I hope this small contribution helps in some way with the investigation of this new system.

    Best regards.

    Greetings.


    I'm not that expert on these Nanos issues, but with my limited knowledge, I've noticed that GTMedia opens some 55W and 58W channels with the current PowerVu system. I've noticed that the channels with the Nanos 01 accompanied by the Nano 08 are the ones that are opening but without audio. The others, like the MUX channels of the Studio Universal 58W, only contain Nano 01 with the other Nanos at 00. For example (0E00 01 00 00). Here are some reference images.

    I've been analyzing and observing some changes in the ECM flows, among other changes, when I was comparing the old PowerVu cisco software with the new one.


    Best regards.