Posts by Prophet

    Depending on your budget of course will depend on what choice of receiver's are an option to you, the site sponsor who you can find here http://www.world-of-satellite.co.uk/ has a great selection of receiver's to suit all budgets


    I personally am a fan of the VU brand receivers which run enigma 2 as an operating system, they start at £99 for the VU Zero which is a pretty basic single tuner receiver but great as a starter receiver, you can see the VU receiver's here http://www.world-of-satellite.co.uk/VU?sort=p.price&order=ASC


    They have plenty of other brand's too, of course if you wish to watch and record more than one channel then consider opting for something with a dual receiver


    Good luck in your search

    Here’s How it Works


    This month UK Internet providers will start their long-awaited piracy alerts campaign. With help from copyright holders and support from the Government, ISPs will send email notifications to subscribers whose connections are allegedly being used to pirate content. Today we take a look at what's in store.


    uk-flagIn an effort to curb online piracy, the movie and music industries reached an agreement with the UK’s leading ISPs to send “educational alerts” to alleged copyright infringers.


    The piracy alerts program is part of the larger Creative Content UK (CCUK) initiative which already introduced several anti-piracy PR campaigns, targeted at the general public as well as the classroom.


    The plan to send out email alerts was first announced several years ago and is about to kick off. According to ISPReview the first providers will start sending out emails later this month.


    The four ISPs who are confirmed to be participating are BT, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin Media, but other providers could join in at a later stage. Thus far CCUK hasn’t announced a lot of detail or specifics on how the program will operate exactly, but here’s what TorrentFreak has learned so far.


    WHAT WILL BE MONITORED?
    The “alerts” system will only apply to P2P file-sharing. In theory, this means that the focus will be almost exclusively on BitTorrent (including apps such as Popcorn Time), as other P2P networks have relatively low user bases.


    Consequently, those who use Usenet providers, streaming services (such as 123movies), or file-hosters such as Zippyshare and 4Shared, are not at risk. In other words, the program only covers a part of all online piracy.


    A spokesperson from CCUK’s “Get it Right” campaign stressed that the alerts represent only one part of the broader program, which also aims to reach other infringers through its other initiatives.


    HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL BE TARGETED?
    The system will apply to everyone whose Internet account has been used to share copyrighted material via P2P networks.


    That said, copyright holders and ISPs have agreed to cap the warnings at 2.5 million over three years. This means that only a fraction of all UK pirates will receive a notice.


    Some people may also receive multiple notices if their account is repeatedly used to share copyrighted material.


    “This ensures that people who might have missed an earlier email receive another one – but also allows time for account holders to take steps to address the issue,” a Get It Right spokesperson informed us.


    WHAT’S IN THE NOTICES?
    While the exact language might differ between ISPs, the notices are primarily meant to inform subscribers that their accounts have been used to share infringing material, while pointing them to legal alternatives.


    “The purpose is to educate UK consumers about the many sources of legal content available, highlight the value of the UK’s creative industries and reduce online copyright infringement,” we were told.


    WHO WILL BE MONITORING THESE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTS?
    While ISPs take part in the scheme, they will not monitor subscribers’ file-sharing activities. The tracking will be done by third-party company MarkMonitor, who are also the technology partner for the U.S. Copyright Alert System.


    This tracking company collects IP-addresses from BitTorrent swarms and sends its findings directly to the Internet providers. The lists with infringing IP-addresses are not shared with any of the rightsholders.


    Each ISP will keep a database of the alleged infringers and send them appropriate warnings. In compliance with local laws and the best practices of the Information Commissioner’s Office, recorded infringements will be stored for a limited time.


    WILL ANY INTERNET ACCOUNTS BE DISCONNECTED?
    There are no disconnections or mitigation measures for repeat infringers under the UK copyright alerts program. Early reports suggested that alleged file-sharers will get up to four warnings after which all subsequent offenses will be ignored.


    This is in line with the overall goal of the campaign which is not targeted at the most hardcore file-sharers. The program is mostly focused on educating casual infringers about the legal alternatives to piracy.


    CAN THE MONITORING BE CIRCUMVENTED?
    The answer to the previous questions already shows that users have plenty of options to bypass the program. They can simply switch to other means of downloading, but there are more alternatives.


    BitTorrent users could hide their IP-addresses through proxy services and VPNs for example. After the U.S. Copyright Alert Program launched in the U.S. there was a huge increase in demand for this kind of anonymity services.


    SO HOW SCARY ARE THE ALERTS?
    CCUK’s “Get it Right” stresses that the main purpose of the system is to inform casual infringers about their inappropriate behavior and point them to legal alternatives.


    The focus lies on education, although the warnings also serve as a deterrent by pointing out that people are not anonymous. For some, this may be enough to cause them to switch to legal alternatives.


    All in all the proposed measures are fairly reasonable, especially when compared to other countries where fines and internet connections are on the table. Whether it will be successful is an entirely different question of course.


    The Creative Content UK team is confident that they can drive some significant change. Several benchmark measurements were taken prior to the campaign, so its effectiveness can be properly measured once the first results come in.

    M7 Group’s Dutch DTH platform Canal Digitaal is phasing out the distribution of the SD versions of the main Dutch public and private channels on Astra 1 at 19.2 degrees East.


    The main channels from public broadcaster NPO and the commercial channels from RTL Nederland and SBS Broadcasting will in the future only be available in HD from the Astra 3 position at 23.5 degrees East. The move was first reported in Broadband TV News last November.


    RTL 7 and Net5 will be the first to be removed on March 22, followed by NPO 3 and RTL 5 on May 2. No dates has been set yet for the end of tha Astra 1 SD transmissions of NPO 1, NPO 2, RTL 4 and SBS6, but this will happen before the end of 2015. At the same time, Canal Digitaal is ending usage of the Mediaguard 2 encryption system.


    Four other channels, RTL 8, Veronica, SBS9 and RTL Z are already only available in HD from Astra 3.


    Canal Digitaal subscribers who have a legacy satellite receiver and/or a Mediaguard 2 smart card will be offered an alternative.

    In a move to “optimise its infrastructure” TV d’Orange will be leaving the Eutelsat 5WA (AB3) and Eutelsat Hotbird satellites in the period starting May, 2016 and ending in December 2016.


    The satellite-delivered DTH service TV d’Orange will in the future only be available on the Astra position of 19.2 degrees East.


    In communication to its customers, TV d’Orange is advising its viewers to redirect the satellite dish towards Astra with a special page on its website. They can continue to use the same satellite receiver. Viewers are entitled to receive EUR60 compensation for the move if they require the use of an installer.


    In a statement the operator said “Orange is the belief that our services can be shared by all. As such, the distribution of satellite TV remains fully complementary to the distribution by ADSL or fibre. This is also why we are strengthening our devices by focusing our platform on Astra.”


    TV d’Orange by satellite is available as a service to those households that are not within the reach of Orange’s FttH and IPTV services.


    The movement means that former Eutelsat viewers will lose a number of channels that are available on Eutelsat Hotbird, but not on Astra, such as numerous international free-to-air channels. On the other hand, Astra offers a large number of channels, including many FTA, that are not available on Hotbird.

    the (in)justice system is truly screwed multipack, those iptv guys earlier in the week got 4 years in prison, yet on the national news 2 weeks ago a lorry driver that killed 2 men got a mere 6 years whilst he was sending Facebook messages to his girlfriend on his phone for at least 20 seconds prior to the crash.

    Pirate Bay & KickassTorrents Music Uploader Jailed For a Year


    A man who uploaded the UK’s Top 40 singles to The Pirate Bay and KickassTorrents each week has been jailed for a year. The Performing Rights Society for Music (PRS) claims that Wayne Evans, a 39-year-old known online as OldSkoolScouse, cost them more than £1m in a single year.


    Following a joint investigation with licensing outfit PRS for Music, last September officers from the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) and Merseyside police raided an address in Everton, Liverpool.


    They were looking for Wayne Evans, a local DJ who they believed was involved in the unlawful distribution of music online.


    Known online as OldSkoolScouse, Evans uploaded packs of the UK’s current Top 40 Singles to torrent sites each week. They included at least 200 uploaded to KickassTorrents, which proved particularly popular with fans.


    cb5a372eb82b.jpg


    In addition, Evans ran DeeJayPortal.co.uk, a website with a membership of more than 160,000 users which specialized in unlicensed a capella versions of famous tracks. Along with OldSkoolScouse.co.uk, another of Evans’ domains, it currently displays a PIPCU seizure notice.


    In October 2016, the 39-year-old appeared before Liverpool Crown Court, pleading guilty to two counts of distributing an article infringing copyright and one of possessing or controlling an article for use in fraud.


    Since cases in the UK tend to be cherry-picked for their PR value, it was no surprise to learn that Evans was painted by the prosecution as a serious criminal.


    According to Liverpool Echo, the Top 40 packs were downloaded more than 523,000 times. There were almost 136,000 downloads of a capella tracks from DJPortal.


    As a result, the Performing Rights Society for Music (PRS), which collects and distributes royalties on behalf of artists, estimated their losses at £1.054m for a single year period.


    David Watson, defending, told the court that Evans hadn’t made much money from his file-sharing activities and that the estimates of PRS were just that, an estimate.


    “These losses are necessarily speculative and difficult to quantify in this case, because not every illegal download leads to the loss of a legitimate sale,” Watson said.


    The court heard how Evans had failed to obtain licenses from PRS for his online distribution. Of course, none would have been granted even if he’d asked, but that was beside the point.


    Judge Robert Trevor-Jones accepted that Evans hadn’t been motivated by personal gain but said that the DJ knew what he was doing and the losses to PRS from his actions were significant.


    “Given your intimate knowledge of the music industry I have no doubt that you would have been aware that what you were doing here was illegal,” he said.


    Despite having no previous convictions, Evans was jailed for 12 months yesterday, a sentence the Judge believed would act as a “deterrent” to others.

    Sky and 21st Century Fox agree £18.5bn takeover deal


    1047d.jpg


    Broadcaster Sky and 21st Century Fox have reached agreement on the terms of a takeover deal.


    Rupert Murdoch's 21st Century Fox will pay £11.7bn for the 61% stake it does not already own.


    Sky shareholders will receive £10.75 in cash for each share, valuing the entire company at £18.5bn.


    The deal comes amid concerns that Rupert Murdoch, who also owns the Sun and the Times newspapers, will have excessive influence over UK media.


    Karen Bradley, the Culture Secretary, will have 10 days to decide whether the Fox bid raises public interest concerns, in this case media plurality, starting from when the companies notify the competition authority. She has the power to ask Ofcom, the media watchdog, to examine the deal.
    More information


    Tom Watson, shadow culture secretary, urged Ms Bradley to refer the deal to Ofcom: "When she stood on the steps of Downing Street this summer, the prime minister said to the people of this country that 'when we take the big calls, we'll think not of the powerful, but you'.
    "This is a big call. The government needs to decide whose side it's on."


    A number of Sky shareholders, including Standard Life Investments and Jupiter Asset Management, have questioned the independence of the non-executive directors and their ability to extract a higher price since a possible bid was announced last Friday.
    Richard Marwood, senior fund manager at Royal London Asset Management, owner of a 0.36% stake in Sky, urged Sky's board to share more information on the independent financial advice that they based their agreement with Fox on.


    "Such disclosure would help shareholders assess the fairness of the offer and give greater confidence in the independence of the committee in the bid process," he said.


    James Murdoch, Rupert Murdoch's son, is both chairman of Sky and chief executive of Fox.


    Sky deputy chairman Martin Gilbert, who is also chief executive of Aberdeen Asset Management, which owns a 0.39% stake in the broadcaster, said: "[We] believe 21st Century Fox's offer at a 40 per cent premium to the undisturbed share price will accelerate and de-risk the delivery of future value for all Sky shareholders. As a result, the independent committee unanimously agreed that we have a proposal that we can put to Sky shareholders and recommend."

    ITV launches new PPV box office platform after acquiring exclusive rights to Chris Eubank Jnr upcoming title fight


    df71fc78d2c6.jpg


    ITV is stepping up its sports offerings with a new Pay Per View (PPV) platform that will launch with the exclusive UK broadcast rights to Chris Eubank Jnr’s next world title fight.


    The broadcaster has acquired the rights to Eubank Jnr’s IBO world super middleweight title bout with Renold Quinlan on 4 February 2017 and will show the event on the newly created ITV Box Office.


    Boxing in the UK has undergone something of a populist revival recently thanks to the likes of Anthony Joshua, Ricky Burns and Chris Eubank Jnr and now ITV is looking to capitalise on the upsurge.


    The move suggests that broadcaster is mounting a challenge for boxing rights to Sky Box Office and the BoxNation subscription channel by tapping into its large terrestrial audience and showcasing an exciting fighter with audience pulling potential.


    Several years have passed since ITV has shown a boxing event of this scale with Carl Frampton's world title fights being the last to feature on its regular free-to-air channels.


    “Live coverage of this world title fight featuring one of Britain’s most exciting young boxers is an event we hope will appeal to sports fans across the country,” said ITV’s director of sport Niall Sloane.


    He added: “Many people will recall watching Chris Eubank Jnr’s father in action in some of his most memorable fights on ITV, so it feels fitting for the Eubank name to feature in the first broadcast on our new channel.”


    Paddy Hobbs, head of sport at Pretty Green, said he found the execution of ITV's announcement "suprising"


    "Made with very little fanfare, no specific date or pricing details and on the eve on Sky Sports’ huge Wembley press conference for Joshua vs Klitschko, it’s certainly at odds with the usual model adopted to declare such a deal," Hobbs.


    He added: "In a sport where selling hype is as important as the quality of the fight itself, ITV don’t appear to have either in place yet. It will be very interesting to see how they approach the build up to their first Box Office offering in the weeks and months to come and utilise the huge reach available through their own platforms to ultimately drive sales."


    ITV has revealed that its ITV4 channel will show a full evening of live boxing ahead of the main card which would be widely available to viewers on television and online.


    It has promised that details of how to register to view the fight, as well as prices, will be revealed well in advance of the event.

    UK Jails Pirate IPTV Box Supplier For Four Years


    A man who supplied piracy-configured Internet-enabled set-top boxes to pubs and consumers in the UK received a four-year prison sentence. The prosecution, brought by The Premier League and supported by the Federation Against Copyright Theft, also resulted in a second man receiving a two-year suspended sentence.


    While many Internet users are happy to use the web to access movies, TV shows, music and sports streams, millions are now doing so from the comfort of their living rooms.


    Amazon’s Fire TV and various Android and Linux devices are all capable of supplying legitimate content, but all have a darker side. With the right know-how and a few tweaks here and there, these cheap pieces of hardware can open a whole new world of pirate streaming.


    As a result, a massive black market of suppliers has sprung up worldwide. There are basically two approaches. The first involves the legal Kodi media player and third-party addons. The second involves professional (but illegal) IPTV services as detailed in our earlier article, either piped through Kodi or dedicated Linux-powered devices.


    Over the past couple of years, the UK’s Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) has targeted individuals selling these kinds of devices and services, but the first convictions have taken a while to arrive. Two have now been delivered and they send a message to people offering these devices in a commercial context.


    After initially involving PIPCU, the prosecution of Terry O’Reilly, 53, and Will O’Leary, 43, was brought by The Premier League, the top professional league for football in the UK. It was alleged that the pair had been selling piracy-configured devices to both pubs and consumers.


    In addition to other media, the devices were able to show Premier League football matches transmitted by foreign channels, a particularly sensitive issue for The Premier League.


    In the UK, football is subject to something known as the “3pm Blackout” or “Closed Period,” which bans live football from TV between 2:45pm and 5:15pm on a Saturday. The ban is designed to encourage match attendance but foreign channels do not abide by the rules. Using either modified Kodi installations or Linux-powered set-top IP boxes, these matches are freely available in the UK.


    The case against O’Leary and O’Reilly was heard at Nottingham Crown Court where both were accused of Conspiracy to Defraud. Speaking with TorrentFreak this morning, a FACT spokesperson confirmed that the pair not only supplied the hardware and software, but were also involved in providing the unauthorized streams.


    O’Reilly, 53, of Liverpool, was accused of selling 1,200 devices. He was found guilty of two charges of Conspiracy to Defraud and jailed for four years.


    O’Leary, 43, of Coddington, Nottinghamshire, was described as a “reseller” of around 300 devices. Commonly, re-sellers purchase access to an already available service and then offer their own customers the same product (sometimes rebranded) while making a profit or earning commission.


    O’Leary admitted one charge of Conspiracy to Defraud and was handed a two-year sentence, suspended for a year.


    “This case is particularly important as it is the first involving sellers of so-called IPTV devices which enable people to watch illegal content,” says Premier League Director of Legal Services, Kevin Plumb.


    “The courts have provided a clear message: this is against the law and selling systems which allow people to watch unauthorized Premier League broadcasts is a form of mass piracy and is sufficiently serious to warrant a custodial sentence.”


    FACT Director General, Kieron Sharp also placed emphasis on the importance of the case in acting as a warning to individuals who sell such devices.


    “The sale and distribution of these boxes, which are loaded with infringing apps and add-ons allowing access to copyrighted content, is a criminal offense and the repercussions could result in years behind bars,” Sharp said.


    In September, the IP Crime Report 2015/16 cited IPTV and modified Kodi installations as a growing threat. FACT said tackling them would become one of its top priorities.


    “In the last year FACT has worked with a wide range of partners and law enforcement bodies to tackle individuals and disrupt businesses selling illegal IPTV boxes. Enforcement action has been widespread across the UK with numerous ongoing investigations,” FACT said.


    In response to the convictions of O’Leary and O’Reilly, The Premier League said that there can now be “no doubt for consumers that these systems are illegal.” However, it remains unclear whether using such devices for streaming in a private setting constitutes a crime.


    The Premier League and broadcasting partner Sky don’t make any effort to target individual consumers who watch these broadcasts but the same cannot be said about device sellers and their commercial customers. Several cases against pubs have gone to court and now The Premier League and FACT have a conviction against suppliers under their belts.


    Finally, it will be interesting to see if the convictions of O’Leary and O’Reilly have an effect on the case pending in Middlesborough against Brian ‘Tomo’ Thompson. He was previously raided by police and Trading Standards after selling “fully loaded” Android boxes from his shop.


    Crucially, however, Thompson wasn’t involved in the supply of the streams, only the hardware and software. That could be all-important for the UK market for pre-configured Kodi-powered devices.