Posts by tryme

    [reader]
    label = newcamd
    protocol = newcamd
    key = 0102030405060708091011121314
    device = external server-host name or ip ,11002
    user = user
    password = password
    group = 1
    fallback = 1


    add the external reader to your server like that

    [reader]
    label = newcamd
    protocol = newcamd
    key = 0102030405060708091011121314
    device = external server-host name or ip ,11002
    user = user
    password = password
    group = 1
    fallback = 1


    add the external reader to your server like that

    if ip address is static or not static just set up your router with any dns server and forward your server ip to the server port and give your clients your hostname it will do the trick

    *** ONE OF THE WORST NIGHTMARES IN CARD-SHARING HISTORY *****************



    hey guys and gals ,


    i have being trying to figured surflock in N*** Provider.


    Situation 1: Card works fine when playing 1 channel continuesly.


    Situation 2: The Lock on Card gets Activated/Trigger when card is bombard with Different Sids , most likely when 2 or 3 Different ECM hit lock randomly.


    Situation 3: The Lock Gets Deactivated when Same SID / ECM with 5 Different pids hit the card.


    A Simple Log collected from Experiment ( Situation 3 )


    In Log : The Lock on Card is already Triggered , and note the lock get deactivate when 5 Different ecm hit 5 times the card with different pids.



    quote:


    2012/09/04 14:41:59 c 16 encrypted newcamd:123-client 127.0.0.1 granted (p1, au(auto)=n***card)
    2012/09/04 14:41:59 c 16 user p1 authenticated successfully (OScam)
    2012/09/04 14:41:59 c 16 AU enabled for user p1 on reader n***card
    2012/09/04 14:41:59 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:AABB): not found (154 ms) (i*****_do_cmd [8] a0 00)
    2012/09/04 14:42:03 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:B1FB): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:07 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:05D7): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:11 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:2291): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:15 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:7A36): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:19 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:38E4): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:23 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:4916): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:27 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:E871): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:31 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:FF57): not found (152 ms) (i*****_do_cmd [8] a0 00)
    2012/09/04 14:42:35 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:9A92): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:39 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:2C15): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:43 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:7553): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:47 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:BAC7): not found (151 ms) (i*****_do_cmd [8] a0 00)
    2012/09/04 14:42:51 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:2A4D): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:55 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:E97E): rejected group (1 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:42:59 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:0679): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:03 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:78C3): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:07 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44großes Grinsen D81): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:17 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44großes Grinsen 960): not found (153 ms) (i*****_do_cmd [8] a0 00)
    2012/09/04 14:43:17 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:F5F2): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:17 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:129C): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:17 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:471A): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:17 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:A2A2): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:17 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:F5A1): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:28 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:782B): not found (144 ms) (i*****_do_cmd [8] a0 00)
    2012/09/04 14:43:28 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:2E8A): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:28 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:FFC6): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:28 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:BAD9): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:29 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:3F4F): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:29 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:2B12): rejected group (0 ms)
    2012/09/04 14:43:39 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:971D): found (178 ms) by n***card
    2012/09/04 14:43:49 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44großes Grinsen 532): found (174 ms) by n***card
    2012/09/04 14:44:00 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:0CFF): found (177 ms) by n***card
    2012/09/04 14:44:11 c 16 p1 (0604&000000/1D99/44:2AC1): found (173 ms) by n***card



    * Rejected Group in Log is because of different Chids in ECM.


    * I bombard the card with 5 copies of same ECM ( Same sid , Same pid ) but it didn't work as expected.


    Possible FIX: :thumbsup:


    The Card Need to be Bombard with Minimum 2 and maximum 5 ECMs ( Same Sids , Different Pids to avoid Surflock Trigger ).


    * To cheat the card , just like to show the card that we are just simply zapping through different channels one by one.


    Solution: Make Oscam to Send 1 Valid ECM + 1 upto 5 Fack ECMs of Same Sid with Different Pids to decode 1 channel.


    ( 1 Upto 5 is Possibility of avoiding lock , we need to test first 1 valid + 1 fack then 1 valid + 2 Fack and so on until we get correct value )


    if we continuously bombard the card with 2 upto 5 ECMs for each channel decode then surflock cant be trigger.


    Oscam must be able to return CW from 1st valid ECM and deliver instantly , and must not have to wait for other fack 1-5 CWs as it can take upto 1000ms to return all 6 CWs.


    ( Its also possible we may get a "not found " and ECM's timestamp is involved )


    A Separate Function in Oscam need for N*** cards , the function need to be activate during initializing of card , Oscam must identify N*** card first to call the dedicated Anti-lock Function.


    * This Method Throttle the Card but after-all we do not have any other solution yet.


    Hope Devs can understand my bad english.



    may be my idea is silly :thumbdown:



    Another Possible fix can be by Blocking certain EMMs which are responsible for keep alive lock , so far i discovered blocking those emms also block the card unglücklich


    ( Clean EMMs and bad Emms ( Lock ) both has same len thats why , we will first need to identify them and block them by emm type or data )



    You are Welcome for discussion ! Your ideas and views about Surflock Augen rollen