Premier League 'wins' pub satellite TV copyright battle

There are 2 replies in this Thread which was already clicked 607 times. The last Post () by pappupappu31.

  • The Premier League is claiming victory against the importers of foreign satellite TV decoders in a high-profile copyright court battle.


    Some British pubs purchase satellite systems from other parts of the European Union, in order to offer Premier League football at a much cheaper cost than Sly and ESPN.


    The High Court has now said that the league can take action against the pubs on grounds of breach of copyright. But the satellite TV firms claim that they are still free to continue offering their services.


    The Premier League took out a civil action against digital box provider QC Suppler and publican SR Leisure Limited, but the case was put on hold in the UK after it was referred to the European Court for legal advice.


    The case was heard alongside the legal action of pub landlady Karen Murphy, who had bought a Greek satellite TV service using a QC decoder to use in her pub in Southsea.


    In a landmark ruling last October the European Court of Justice said that national laws prohibiting the import, sale or use of foreign decoder cards were "contrary to the freedom to provide services and cannot be justified either in light of the objective of protecting intellectual property rights or by the objective of encouraging the public to attend football stadiums".


    However, the court also said that any opening video sequences, the Premier League anthem and pre-recorded highlights or graphics were "works" and so to show them in a pub would require permission from the Premier League.


    Following the ruling, the High Court said that importers of foreign satellite equipment had breached the Premier League's copyright by allowing pubs to show foreign broadcasts.


    But Lord Justice Kitchin said that the league had only proved its claims of breach of copyright "to a limited extent".


    "The defendants who are continuing to trade must be entitled to carry on their business in a way which avoids infringement of [Premier League] copyright if they are able to do so," Kitchin said in the judgment.


    Nick Noble, a Premier League spokesman, said that the judgement was "consistent with the ECJ ruling", adding: "The law gives us the right to prevent the unauthorised use of our copyrights in pubs and clubs when they are communicated to the public without our authority."


    In a statement, the league added: "We will now resume actions against publicans who are using European Economic Area foreign satellite systems to show Premier League football on their premises unlawfully and without our authority."


    But Anand Pattani, the lawyer representing QC Leisure and other defendants, told BBC News that the judge had "dismissed" the majority of league's claims against his clients.


    "Our clients are extremely pleased that, in line with the finding of the European Court, the judgment confirms that the majority of claims against our clients are to be dismissed," he said.


    "Insofar as there has been a finding of infringement relating to a limited number of artistic works our clients also welcome Lord Justice Kitchin's confirmation that they must be entitled to carry on their business in a way which avoids any such infringement."


    Karen Murphy's case is due to be heard in the High Court later this year.

    :shamon:

    • Official Post

    High Court draw for Premier League


    The English Premier League and the importers of foreign STBs and cards are both claiming victory after the latest High Court ruling.


    After a High Court hearing this week, the League says it will take action against pubs for breach of copyright. But the importers say they are free to carry on their business.


    The Premier League had initially taken out a civil action against QC Leisure, importer, and SR Leisure Limited, publican. Along with the now famous case of pub landlady Karen Murphy, the case was sent to Europe for legal advice and guidance on points of law. UK prosecutions for using these systems were put on hold.


    The European courts ruled that national laws that prohibit the import, sale or use of foreign decoder cards were contrary to the freedom to provide services. But it also said while live matches were not protected by copyright, any surrounding media, such as any opening video sequence, the Premier League anthem, pre-recorded films showing highlights of recent Premier League matches and various graphics, were.


    Now the High Court has said that in some aspects the importers of foreign satellite equipment had been in breach of Premier League copyright by allowing the showing of foreign broadcasts. But it also said that the Premier League had only proved its claims of breach of copyright “to a limited extent”.


    Lord Justice Kitchen said that “the defendants who are continuing to trade must be entitled to carry on their business in a way which avoids infringement of [Premier League] copyright if they are able to do so”.


    Furthermore, he said that clauses in Premier League TV contracts with national broadcasters that prohibit them from broadcasting Premier League games outside their own country’s borders may constitute “a restriction on competition”.


    The Premier League said: “It is clear that the law gives us the right to prevent the unauthorised use of our copyrights in pubs and clubs when they are communicated to the public without our authority. We will now resume actions against publicans who are using European Economic Area foreign satellite systems to show Premier League football on their premises unlawfully and without our authority.”


    Smithfield Partners which has represented QC Leisure and other defendants said “Our clients are extremely pleased that, in line with the finding of the European Court, the judgment confirms that the majority of claims against our clients are to be dismissed.”


    The High Court is now expected to “make a declaration which will set out the precise infringing acts established against QC Leisure and the other defendants”.
    __________________

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!