Some updates for Irdeto ...
Please, test one of these versions and report if it's OK Or not
and check if the 'Canal+ Sport 4 TEST' (0624) channel works in the case of 'disablecrccws=0'...
Thans,
Some updates for Irdeto ...
Please, test one of these versions and report if it's OK Or not
and check if the 'Canal+ Sport 4 TEST' (0624) channel works in the case of 'disablecrccws=0'...
Thans,
I tested the ARM version on Octagon 8008 + OpenATV 7.5 and it's OK, Canal+ Sport 4 TEST also runs with disablecrccws=0.
arm version on RPi4 - OK and Canal+ Sport 4 TEST also runs with disablecrccws=0.
The mipsel version works really well with a gigablue quad.
Thanks for the updates.
Ps does this have emu support?
Display MoreSome updates for Irdeto ...
Please, test one of these versions and report if it's OK Or not
and check if the 'Canal+ Sport 4 TEST' (0624) channel works in the case of 'disablecrccws=0'...
Thans,
Could I ask for a compilation for x86_64?
Could I ask for a compilation for x86_64?
( RE: Samur - OSCam For Linux PC [ Ubuntu, i686, Debian, Alpine ] )
;
Could I ask for a compilation for oscam Cygwin (Windows) ?
Could I ask for a compilation for oscam Cygwin (Windows) ?
Sorry, no windows version.
>>>
I do it for 10 different devices(Arch, ....etc) and that's enough :
( RE: Samur - OSCam For Octagon and others [ gx boxes_Arch:c-sky/arm ] )
( RE: Samur - OSCam For Linux PC [ Ubuntu, i686, Debian, Alpine ] )
( RE: Samur - OSCam For Dreambox ONE/TWO [ aarch64 ] )
( RE: Samur - OSCam For sf8008 and others [ boxes_Arch:arm ] )
( RE: Samur - OSCam For Mipsel Boxes [ VuPlus HD, DM HD, ] )
( RE: OSCam For CoreELEC and Rpi3 )
( RE: Samur - OSCam For Android-stapi and Amiko A4_A5 Devices )
( RE: Samur - OSCam For sh4, sh4-stapi and sh4-stapi5 Devices !!! )
( RE: OSCam For Qnap/Nas [ arm ] )
( RE: OSCam For Openwrt_mt7620 !!! )
<<<
;
Hello,
I have a request :
is there someone who has: 0664 Or 0627 ....etc ?
and if yes we will continue in private (i will contact you ....)
###
also if someone has 0639 and his card working with a some special private oscam .
same thing as above.....
I don't have the position where the 0639 is used but
is that really 0639 need CWPK for the decryption ?
#########
Note: I don't need rubbish comments in this thread so then only those concerned ....etc
thanks,
Thank you very much to the Administrators for the reaction.
;
Some updates ...
can someone test 0624 and report if it's ok or not...?
Thanks,
oscam skylink 0624 no dark
0624 dark also arm version
....
I don't know maybe you need a ban...
in the first page your post was deleted by the Admins and you still continue
i hope the Admin will warn you ...
this is the last warning before the ban .
on RPi4 test version oscam - dark
on RPi4 test version oscam - dark
0653 tested and it works with extra layer.
##
I know that czech/slovak forums are not happy because Irdeto with the Extra protection is now for almost for everyone.
and they are doing much money with this Irdeto layer in private.
but now the business is a little down ...
thanks,
I'll try when I get home, I'll let you know
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!