just whipped up a dm500 with oscam #7782 only on it
testing it and seems to be fine
sly sports news hd - (93 ms)
sly sports 1 hd - (81 ms)
onscreen ecm timings around 100ms
albeit only using one test account on it with latest whitelist
could this be a cccam thing then?
edit: scratch the above even oscam shows lows ecms still getting some glicthing :(
using laptop with oscam 7934 and omnikey readers *** sports news 0.800s
I can also confirm high ecm times from all sly sports hd channels even espn,funny enough the ones without the hd seems ok bit weird if you ask me.
Iam using ubuntu 10.4 also oscam with smargo reader also the card is overclocked to 12.0 mhz,also i have only six peers dit strange to me.
oscam only yes? no cccam at all?
what are the ecm times you are getting in oscam?
today has been a odd day, running oscam/cccam server on dm500 and ecms have been all over the show, seems to have settled down now with the correct whitelists but one channel stands out for me, doesn't glitch but is higher than normal
|B***B - Sly Sports News HD [NDS3] (ok)| 0.1749s |it never used to be that high, anyone have the same? this is using cam35 udp protocol to link cccam and oscam as i find newcamd too slow
tried in pc server (oscam/cccam) and dm500 (oscam/cccam).
oddly enough ecm is higher (0.2455s) when using pc server (oscam/cccam) with smargo and powered USB hub
was it just me that saw higher than normal ECMs on this card today? sly playing around???
its ok, happy with cs357x for the time being
do the clones pass all UK safety regulations?
if not then yes, the risk is high!
you shouldnt use DMZ mate, port forward instead if you can
i know cs357x uses L line in cccam but what does cs378x use?
i tried using L line but didnt work!
anyone know which one is better to use to link cccam server to oscam reader? cs357x UDP or cs378x TCP?
thanks
gone back to smargo with usb hub
with cs357x instead of newcamd
getting in cccam (with oscam as reader):
0.0803s
0.0768s
0.0862s
and max ive seen is 0.16 when it spikes
last few entries from oscam log
2012/10/28 17:41:59 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/0FA1/6A:4CE5): found (82 ms) by smartreader
2012/10/28 17:42:00 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/1076/62:E838): found (76 ms) by smartreader
2012/10/28 17:42:00 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/0516/72:351A): found (84 ms) by smartreader
2012/10/28 17:42:02 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/CCBF/62:82EA): found (80 ms) by smartreader
2012/10/28 17:42:03 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/CB91/62:16F3): found (80 ms) by smartreader
2012/10/28 17:42:06 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/0F25/6A:B5BE): found (82 ms) by smartreader
2012/10/28 17:42:08 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/0FA1/6A:5BDF): found (82 ms) by smartreader
2012/10/28 17:42:09 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/1076/62:A3CA): found (76 ms) by smartreader
2012/10/28 17:42:09 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/0516/72:9549): found (85 ms) by smartreader
2012/10/28 17:42:10 26358E0 c cccam (0963&000000/0000/CCBF/62:FE92): found (80 ms) by smartreaderid recommend all to use camd35 protocol to link cccam to oscam
guide here: http://linuxsat-support.com/os…using-camd3-protocol.html
like oscam or doesnt it support caching?
cccam 2.1.3 that is
thanks
well i tried cs357x instead of newcamd and ECM times have improved drastically!
will monitor but am very pleased :)
sounds like boxkey is the issue
is it defo correct?
edit: beaten to it :)
anyone used L line (cs357x) instead of N line for the link between oscam and cccam?
does it work better than newcamd?
Thanks guys
Will try without the hub then, less wires is always nice!
I did try oscam only and didn't like the fact it kept disconnecting users randomly. Hence moved to cccam and oscam. Muh stable imo but there is there is the ecm delay between oscam to cccam. Anyway of making this link faster?
heard some good things about the omnikey so bought one and fitted today.
got it working with white uk card, oscam #7750 with pcsc support, D-link hub and getting higher ECM times than my smargo
current ecm times in oscam 110ms and in cccam 0.11 to 0.200 when it spikes
if i dont set any mhz and cardmhz then it defaults to 3.57Mhz,
2012/10/28 08:58:01 17D76D0 r omnikey [pcsc] Cardfrequency advertised by ATR is 5 Mhz, set clock of reader device to 3.57 Mhz as specified by user in reader MHZ settingif i set to 686 then oscam tells me it has clocked to 6.86 but speeds do not improve
ive read that omnikeys cant be overclocked so how do you guys get sub 0.1 ms ecm times with it? i was hoping for 0.09 or lower!
[reader]
label = omnikey
protocol = pcsc
device = 0
caid = 0963
ecmwhitelist = 0963:3E,4F,42,44,45,47,4E,53,54,56,61,67,62,68,69,6A,6B,6E,6D,6F,71,72,73,77,78,74,79,7A,7C,7E,80,8B,85
detect = cd
group = 1
emmcache = 1,3,2
blockemm-unknown = 1
blockemm-g = 1
lb_weight = 101or is this the best i can achieve with oscam/cccam combo?
thanks!
excellent guide
got it working with a smargo but now want to try Omnikey
have followed the guide here:http://linuxsat-support.com/li…key-readers-linux-pc.html ("ubuntu way")
when i add this config:
[reader]
label = omnikey
protocol = pcsc
device = 001:004
caid = 0963
ecmwhitelist = 0963:3E,4F,42,44,45,47,4E,53,54,56,61,67,62,68,69,6A,6B,6E,6D,6F,71,72,73,77,78,74,79,7A,7C,7E,80,8B,85
#mhz = 686
#cardmhz = 500
group = 1
emmcache = 1,3,2
blockemm-unknown = 1
blockemm-g = 1
blockemm-s = 0
blockemm-u = 0
lb_weight = 101in oscam i get:
2012/10/27 13:23:57 203CEF0 r omnikey [mouse] ERROR: Opening device 001:004 (errno=2 No such file or directory)
2012/10/27 13:23:57 203CEF0 r omnikey [mouse] Cannot open device: 001:004i have done scan usb and its defo 001:004 and ive tried with and without Detect = cd
any ideas?
can this be used with ubuntu running oscam/cccam?
ot a work around for this now
Oscam/CCcam combo
seems to work fine with all the testing ive done with it
lets see if my ticket on oscam gets reviewed
what version oscam mate?
seems odd that you have no activity on the server when they try to connect
have you asked your clients to restart the cam and see what happens then?
