I put it on my usb drive and booted the duo up removed it when requested and it just got stuck on starting. I tried formatting the USB Drive and using a different port, but still without success...
Might try again after, was merely a passing comment more than anything.
This is what happens with these latest images on clone duo/solo boxes.
How does this image compare with previous, 1.7.5?
1.7.5 gave me lots of GSOD.
Also, why did you pick this version of oscam?
btw thanks Muso, good job.
I too had this problem I easily solved it by putting up a "whistler" :
I never got it to automatically search + find and i tried every single form ,simple,expert, toneburst, etcetc...
can´t try it now as the motor is KO and I took the "whistler" down air traffic became too heavy to bare round these parts!!!
any excuse to put up that pic!! lol ;)
Display Morei tried every version of BH image in last week from 172 to most recent !
Every time i try to load TS panel ipk i get Operation failed !
usually log says cant write /usr/script/uptime.sh already exists !
i got round this in every version by renaming uptime.sh to old.uptime.sh < Then ts panel installs and operates correctly !
will this change effect the duos performance for any reason ?
hope this helps anyone with similar problems
I get that 'already exists error somethimes too. Must try that renaming fix. Ta
Try it without USALS. Get your dish to 28.2 and save that as position 28, then do same for your other sats ie 19.2 saved as 19.2.
Worth a try.
try installing by sending the required file to tmp folder via ftp. Rather than from ts panel.
You could also try reflashing the bootloader.
Maybe try a different image or even a different usb stick to flash with.
I'm finding this image to have a lot less GSOD's than the BH images I was using previously
http://linuxsat-support.com/vu…eady-backup-musogeek.html
Thanks Muso.
Updated to a later version of oscam there. See how that goes.
Do the logs I posted suggest any other problems?
Already have had a client cull.
Did try updating to later version of oscam but for some reason my locals were not connecting.
I noticed that in some versions of oscam additional files were added to the tuxbox folder.
Currently I just use conf, server & user files.
still drops every few hours.
Here is oscam log
2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r >> OSCam << cardserver log switched, version 1.20-unstable_svn, build #6059 (mips-tuxbox-linux)
2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r version=1.20-unstable_svn, build #6059, system=mips-tuxbox-linux, nice=-1
2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r client max. idle=120 sec, debug level=0
2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r max. logsize=10 Kb, loghistorysize=4096 bytes
2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r client timeout=5000 ms, fallback timeout=2500 ms, cache delay=120 ms
2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r ERROR in IO_Serial_Read (errno=0 Success)
2012/07/07 21:39:59 575860 r ERROR in IO_Serial_Read (errno=0 Success)
2012/07/07 21:39:59 575860 r [videoguard2-reader] classD0 ins40: (-2) status not ok c4 a8
2012/07/07 21:39:59 575860 r Error processing ecm for caid 0963, srvid 2582 (servicename: 0963:2582 unknown) on reader ***uk.
and in the messages:
Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F35754 seq 81F35754 - 81F35CB8
Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F35CB8 seq 81F35CB8 - 81F3621C
Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3621C seq 81F3621C - 81F3626C
Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3626C seq 81F3626C - 81F367D0
Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F36884 seq 81F36DE8 - 81F3734C
Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F36884 seq 81F3734C - 81F378B0
Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F36884 seq 81F378B0 - 81F37E14
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F36884 seq 81F37E14 - 81F38378
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F36DE8 seq 81F36DE8 - 81F3734C
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3734C seq 81F3734C - 81F378B0
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F378B0 seq 81F378B0 - 81F37E14
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F37E14 seq 81F37E14 - 81F38378
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F39922 - 81F39E86
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F39E86 - 81F3A3EA
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F3A3EA - 81F3A94E
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F3A94E - 81F3AEB2
Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F3AEB2 - 81F3AEDF
Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F39922 seq 81F39922 - 81F39E86
Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F39E86 seq 81F39E86 - 81F3A3EA
Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3A3EA seq 81F3A3EA - 81F3A94E
Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3A94E seq 81F3A94E - 81F3AEB2
Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3AEB2 seq 81F3AEB2 - 81F3AEDF
Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F3AF18 seq 81F3B47C - 81F3B9E0
Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F3AF18 seq 81F3B9E0 - 81F3BF44
Not sure if that is relevant.
Was having issues with my ISP in that web pages were very slow to load. Even though my download speeds are about 70 meg.
This worked for me:
namebench - Open-source DNS Benchmark Utility - Google Project Hosting
Are you a power-user with 5 minutes to spare? Do you want a faster internet experience?
Try out namebench. It hunts down the fastest DNS servers available for your computer to use. namebench runs a fair and thorough benchmark using your web browser history, tcpdump output, or standardized datasets in order to provide an individualized recommendation. namebench is completely free and does not modify your system in any way. This project began as a 20% project at Google.
namebench runs on Mac OS X, Windows, and UNIX, and is available with a graphical user interface as well as a command-line interface.
Just noticed my solo with vix 2.4 is also showing wrong time.
Its on the 'to do' list.
Yup, this is defo the right place to be to get all the required help :)
Certainly an option mate as I have lots of old PC components. Just reluctant to step onto the PC server minefield and have limited time atm with the little un round my feet most days.
Its not being read, until I restart cam. Yes, prefer local is 1.
yeah 30 likely is too much. Hopefully the new VU when it comes out can handle 30 :)
Post configs later.
cheers
I have recently changed to fibre broadband. Since doing this I have noticed an increase in the number of active peers. Likely due to my ping etc improving.
I have a total of 30 peers using VU duo as server with oscam/cccam.
Now I notice that my main local drops quite a bit from my server :( Is this due to it being hammered? How many active peers is healthy & stable for vu duo and my card?
Current Usage (ECM requests/h) : 3553
Average Usage (ECM requests/h) : 9787
Thanks for reading, any help appreciated.
¿you got the TV SHOWS ( v2 ) working on bh 174 ????
I´ve tried a few times but no joy :(
TV Shows isn't working on BH 1.7.4, but movies are.
v2 of the plugin didn't work whatsoever for me.
Tv shows is working on latest VIX image on my vu solo though (v2 of the plugin)
Its working fine for me on a vu+ duo with Blackhole 1.7.4
he's a bit of a trucker is our Mckee :) So he likes to play convoy, rubber ducky chat etc with his fellow truckers!
Got a duo and a solo clone. No complaints here. Haven't had the clone very long but so far its working fine, 100%. No matter what people say about the clones there is one good thing about them. The genuine manufacturers and retailers will have to try and compete. This in theory should mean better quality and lower prices for us :)
