Posts by Prophet

    1872aa.jpg


    The Premier League has issued legal proceedings in a civil claim against Neosat, a business accused of supplying illegal broadcast systems which facilitate pirated streams of its football matches.


    This will be the fourth supplier the League has taken civil legal action against in the last 12 months – with a number of others set to follow.


    A further two suppliers were recently subject to criminal action and custodial sentences were secured against the individuals involved in both cases.


    In a separate development, the Premier League will receive costs in excess of £100,000 (€133, 000) as part of a wave of civil actions and settlements in late 2015 and early 2016.


    In all cases the pubs were broadcasting unauthorised foreign broadcasts of the League’s football matches. The pubs are:


    The Sun Inn, Burnley (ordered by the High Court to pay £11,000)
    The Spider’s Web, Grimsby (ordered by the High Court to pay £10,000)
    Hope and Anchor Inn, Oldham (ordered by the High Court to pay £7,000)
    The Crown, Gateshead (ordered by the High Court to pay £6,500)
    The Auctioneer’s Arms, Stoke on Trent (agreed to pay £10,400)
    The Nightjar, Hull (agreed to pay costs of £10,000)
    Three Horseshoes, Whetstone, London (agreed to pay costs of £9,750)
    The Bluestone, Immingham (agreed to pay costs of £9,750)
    The Quays, London N7 (agreed to pay costs of £9,000)
    Crown and Cushion, Manchester (agreed to pay costs of £8,000)
    Mountain Daisy, Sunderland (agreed to pay costs of £6,750)
    The Plough, Milton Keynes (agreed to pay costs of £6,500)
    Total: £104,650


    “The feedback we have had from publicans in recent years is that we should be focusing on suppliers. We have listened and Neosat will be the fourth major supplier we have taken civil action against in the last 12 months,” the Premier League said in a Statement.


    “The actions against suppliers and pubs in recent weeks and months make it absolutely clear that there are huge risks for pubs when they enter into contracts with suppliers other than a commercial subscription with Sky Sports and BT Sport. Our message to pubs is clear: don’t take the risk and call Sky and BT to find out about their latest offers for commercial premises in the UK."


    Source : http://advanced-television.com…ainst-illegal-broadcasts/

    Netflix is continuing to expand its VPN and proxy crackdown, affecting VPN 'pirates' but also those who use such services for privacy reasons. The VPN crackdown is meeting fierce resistance from privacy activists and concerned users, with tens of thousands calling upon the streaming service to reverse its broad VPN ban.


    acb1f546cd67a6ff6a.png


    Last month Netflix announced that it would increase its efforts to block customers who circumvent geo-blockades.


    As a result it has become harder to use VPN services and proxies to access Netflix content from other countries, something various movie studios have repeatedly called for.


    With the application of commercial blacklist data, Netflix already blocks IP-addresses that are linked to such services, something which also affects well-intentioned customers who merely use a VPN to protect their privacy.


    Instead of providing access to the latest video entertainment, Netflix then serves the following error message to these blocked users.


    add3856fd12007.jpg


    n recent weeks TorrentFreak has kept a close eye on the expanding blockade and its aftermath. We’ve learned that servers belonging to many popular commercial VPN services have been added to the blocklist, including ExpressVPN, Mullvad, Private Internet Access and StrongVPN.


    While the blocks are being rolled out in phases, it’s already clear that some VPN users can’t access Netflix, even if the VPN server is located in the same country as they are. This means that Americans can no longer use a U.S. VPN server to protect their privacy.


    Ironically, Netflix is even restricting access to its own original series, despite being the primary rightsholder.


    This approach is meeting fierce resistance from many sides. To coordinate the protest Digital rights organization OpenMedia has started an OpenMedia petition urging Netflix to rethink its approach, which has already been signed by more than 33,000 people.


    “Privacy is a huge priority for us as a digital rights organization, and that VPNs are probably the simplest, most user-friendly way for everyday Internet users to safeguard their online activities,” OpenMedia spokesperson David Christopher informs TorrentFreak.


    “Given that a huge percentage of the population uses Netflix, if they were all forced to stop using VPNs, that would represent a major setback for privacy,” he adds.


    OpenMedia itself has been affected by the new measures as well, as some of their staff members can no longer watch Netflix without having to turn off their VPN.


    The group is concerned that Internet users are being forced to give up their privacy when they are not even trying to circumvent any geo-blockades. A better way would be to restrict content based on people’s credit card addresses, which doesn’t require any VPN blocking.


    “We’re cooking up plans to take this message directly to Netflix and hope that if enough people speak up, Netflix will listen to their customers and find a better way,” Christopher says.


    Meanwhile, the complaints keep pouring in on social media. There are even reports from users who are blocked without even using a VPN. In addition, several people claim to have ended their Netflix subscriptions due to the restrictive policies, and some hint at going back to their old pirate ways.


    Despite the public outrage, Netflix said that it’s not worried about a subscriber exodus. “I don’t think we will see any impact,” CEO Reed Hastings said in a shareholders’ interview last month.


    In the long-term the company hopes to make the entire geo-blocking discussion obsolete by offering movies and TV-shows worldwide. But given Hollywood’s reluctance to adapt, it may take a few years before this will be realized.

    The company behind the popular DVDFab software has announced it will not be supporting decryption of the enhanced Advanced Access Content System that will be used to protect new Ultra HD (4K UHD) Blu-ray discs. The announcement comes just a day after rival copying software company SlySoft confirmed its closure.


    01158211c62ab197f3723.jpg


    SlySoft was a company that gained a reputation for producing software designed to circumvent copyright protection mechanisms. Among them was AnyDVD, a device driver for Windows which allowed users to decrypt DVDs and Blu-ray discs on the fly.


    Under pressure from AACS LA, a decryption licensing outfit founded by a group of powerful Hollywood movie studios and various technology partners, SlySoft first went dark and then announced its closure this week.


    And now, in the space of just a couple of days, another DVD/Blu-ray copying software company also appears to be feeling the heat.


    Like SlySoft, China-based Fengtao Software has also been involved in a dispute with AACS LA and in 2014 was the subject of a preliminary injunction after a court found that DVDFab violates the DMCA’s anti-circumvention clause. In 2015 a federal court in New York extended the injunction, further pressuring the company.


    Then yesterday, just a day after the closure of SlySoft, Fengtao dropped a bombshell of its own. In a press release sent to Myce the company announced that DVDFab will not be updated to crack the Advanced Access Content System encryption that will be present in the next generation of 4K UHD Blu-ray discs.


    “The next version of AACS Copy Protection accompanying those newly released Ultra HD Blu-ray titles is the version 2.0 of Advanced Access Content System. According to a document called AACS 2.0 Draft, the new copy protection requires the Ultra HD Blu-ray players to support two AACS 2.0 functionalities, one named ‘basic’ and the other referred as ‘enhanced’,” the company said in a statement.


    “Fengtao Software Inc. makes it clear that the company will not decrypt or circumvent AACS 2.0 in the days to come. This is in accordance with AACS-LA, (which has not made public the specifications for AACS 2.0), the BDA and the movie studios.”


    Noting that the debate over copying commercial movie discs for home use has “raged on for decades”, Fengtao says that the practice of decrypting copy protection technology has done so too and is not likely to stop in the foreseeable future. Even the fact that AACS 2.0 requires an Internet connection for Ultra HD Blu-ray discs to be played back for the first time is unlikely to stop the problem.


    “Now here comes the question: will there be a solution to crack AACS 2.0? Likely, there will be, publicly or secretly,” the company says. Nevertheless, Fengtao insists that it won’t be behind the effort.


    The company won’t be shutting down though. Fengtao says that it will concentrate its development efforts on DVDFab and its support for editing 4K/UHD content.

    ec8e0ec425a35d830e24.jpg


    Calls by industry competitors for BT’s network subsidiary Openreach to be spun off have been resisted, but UK comms regulator Ofcom has decided it is necessary to overhaul Openreach’s governance and strengthen its independence from BT. Ofcom has set out how it plans to improve telecoms quality and coverage, so that UK consumers and businesses receive the best possible phone and broadband services following its Strategic Review of Digital Communications, which is designed to make the UK a world-leading digital economy over the next decade and beyond.


    Its key recommendations are:


    BT must open up network, so competitors can connect fibre to homes and offices
    Reform of Openreach to better serve UK consumers and businesses
    Better quality of service for all customers, including automatic compensation
    Many of these measures affect all major phone and broadband providers. Others relate specifically to Openreach, the division of BT that maintains the UK’s largest phone and broadband network on behalf of competing providers.


    Ofcom’s decisions are designed to achieve:


    A choice of networks for consumers and businesses. Openreach must open up its network of telegraph poles and underground tunnels to allow rivals to build their own, advanced fibre networks, connected directly to homes and offices.
    Reform of Openreach. Openreach needs to change, taking its own decisions on budget, investment and strategy, in consultation with the wider industry.
    Better quality of service across the telecoms industry. Ofcom intends to introduce tougher rules on faults, repairs and installations; transparent information on service quality; and automatic compensation for consumers when things go wrong.
    Better broadband and mobile coverage. Ofcom will work with the Government to deliver a new universal right to fast, affordable broadband for every household and business in the UK. It also intends to place new obligations in future spectrum licences to improve rural mobile coverage.
    Supporting investment to provide a choice of networks


    Ofcom has unveiled a new strategy to promote large-scale roll-out of new ultrafast broadband networks, based on cable and fibre lines, as an alternative to the partly copper-based technologies currently being planned by BT.


    Supporting investment by rival providers will reduce the country’s reliance on Openreach, and increase competitive pressure on its network.


    To help bring this about, Openreach will be required to open up its telegraph poles and ‘ducts’ – the small, underground tunnels that carry telecoms lines. Using these, rival providers will be able to build their own fibre networks, connected directly to homes and offices.


    Openreach must make it much easier for competitors to access this network, and provide comprehensive data on the nature and location of its ducts and poles. This new ‘digital map’ of the UK will allow competing operators to invest, plan and lay advanced networks, giving people more choice over how they receive their phone and broadband services.


    A new model for Openreach


    Openreach is part of BT Group, but has obligations to treat all its customers equally. Ofcom introduced this structure in 2005, and it has delivered benefits such as stronger competition.


    However, the evidence from Ofcom’s review shows Openreach still has an incentive to make decisions in the interests of BT, rather than BT’s competitors, which can lead to competition problems.


    For example, Openreach’s governance lacks independence from BT Group. The wider company has retained control over Openreach’s decision-making and the budget that is spent on the network, and other telecoms companies have not been consulted sufficiently on investment plans that affect them.


    For these reasons, Ofcom has decided it is necessary to overhaul Openreach’s governance and strengthen its independence from BT. In future, Openreach needs to take its own decisions on budget, investment and strategy – such as the deployment of new networks.


    Openreach management should be required to serve all wholesale customers equally, and consult them on its investment plans. There will also be greater transparency over how costs and assets are allocated between Openreach and the rest of BT.


    Ofcom will prepare detailed proposals later this year to implement these changes. The new model might require Openreach to become a ring-fenced, ‘wholly-owned subsidiary’ of BT Group, with its own purpose and board members. If necessary, Ofcom reserves the right to require BT to spin off Openreach as an entirely separate legal entity, with its own shareholders.


    A step-change in quality of service


    Ofcom intends to introduce a range of measures designed to ensure that all phone and broadband companies provide the quality of service that customers expect.


    First, Openreach will be subject to tougher, minimum requirements to repair faults and install new lines more quickly. These will build on measures introduced by Ofcom in 2014, but will set higher minimum standards and extend to other aspects of performance, such as how often faults occur.


    Second, Ofcom will introduce performance tables on quality of service, identifying the best and worst operators on a range of performance measures so that customers can shop around with confidence.


    Third, Ofcom intends to introduce automatic compensation for consumers and businesses when things go wrong. Broadband, landline and mobile customers will no longer have to seek redress themselves, but will instead receive refunds automatically for any loss or reduction of service.


    Better broadband and mobile coverage


    Coverage of broadband and mobile services is increasing fast. More than eight in ten UK premises can now receive superfast broadband, and this is expected to reach 95 per cent next year. Under Ofcom rules, 98 per cent of homes and offices must receive an indoor 4G mobile signal by next year.


    However, Ofcom remains concerned about those who cannot receive an acceptable service. It will work with the Government to deliver the new universal right to fast, affordable broadband for every household and business in the UK. It also intends to place new obligations in future spectrum licences to improve rural mobile coverage.


    Ofcom will also ensure that consumers have accurate and easy-to-use coverage information, to help them choose the best provider. This will place further pressure on mobile network operators to improve coverage.


    Last year, Ofcom launched a comprehensive map of mobile coverage by postcode for the whole UK. This will soon be updated to include broadband coverage, and we intend later to offer data for individual addresses.


    Ofcom will soon consult on plans to make it easier for mobile customers to switch provider, to help increase competition in the market.


    A better deal for telecoms users


    Sharon White, Ofcom Chief Executive, said: “People across the UK today need affordable, reliable phone and broadband services. Coverage and quality are improving, but not fast enough to meet the growing expectations of consumers and businesses.


    “So today we’ve announced fundamental reform of the telecoms market – more competition, a new structure for Openreach, tougher performance targets, and a range of measures to boost service quality.


    “Together, this means a better deal for telecoms users, which will improve the services and networks that underpin how we live and work.”


    The Review’s initial conclusions explain next steps on all the policies arising from Ofcom’s review. For example, over the next year, Ofcom will:


    set out new standards for Openreach and wider quality of service, together with details of how access to Openreach’s network can be provided;
    prepare specific plans for discussion with the European Commission on Openreach governance and network access;
    consult on introducing automatic compensation;
    consult on making switching easier for mobile customers; and
    publish the first performance tables for quality of service
    According to Paolo Pescatore, Director, Multiplay and Media at CCS Insight, the outcome comes as no surprise. “There were really only two viable options available and Ofcom, under the new leadership of Sharon White, has chosen to take a firm position by strengthening the current model,” he suggested.


    “With this in mind, all providers will now be claiming victory. BT’s rivals have mounted enough pressure to raise concerns about how competing companies gain access to a shared infrastructure, and BT has acknowledged some of its shortcomings and has pledged to address them. Overall, Ofcom has called for reform but no separation for Openreach. Rivals will be delighted that Ofcom is calling for more independence of Openreach from BT with on overhaul of its governance, but will require EU approval which is no easy feat.


    Inevitably BT will breathe sigh of relief. Openreach contributes significant profits to the company and being forced to open up its network will spur rivals and could drive greater competition. Going forward we believe there will be a clear focus on fibre for the UK’s broadband future driving competition in this area. As expected, Ofcom has also clamped down hard on Openreach customer service, which is clearly a major concern with the current model.


    However, this is really only a start of the next phase and there is still a long road ahead before a formal conclusion will be reached. It has already taken more than a year to get this point so all parties now need to work collectively to ensure an efficient and speedy outcome in the interests of consumers.


    Moving forward Ofcom needs to bring forward a strategic review of the telecoms market to ensure the UK stays at the forefront. With this in mind, it is paramount to also consider other segments like pay-TV, OTT and 5G,” he declared.


    “An Ofcom review into Openreach’s future is much needed,” commented Richard Neudegg, Head of Regulation at price comparison service uSwitch.com. Under scrutiny is its quality of service, incentive to invest in the UK’s broadband network and how to open up more of its infrastructure to other providers – all questions that require a thoughtful resolution.


    “By attempting a repeat of the tactics used in its decade-old Strategic Review and leaving open referring BT to a competition authority – which could separate out what is now Openreach from the rest of BT – Ofcom is clearly hoping to force significant change on how Openreach operates within BT Group. But this will not happen overnight.


    “While important, it could create a convenient distraction for the industry, and we urge Ofcom not to lose sight of the other issues considered in its review – especially when there are genuine threats to consumer engagement and competition which must be tackled.


    “For consumers, the communications market is becoming harder to navigate. A shift towards multi-play deals that bundle together broadband, fixed line, mobile and television could become more common following the recent merger of giants EE and BT. But bundle prices are trickier to compare, and can also make things harder for unhappy customers to leave.


    “Many people can save up to £157 a year just by switching their broadband and home phone provider, so we don’t want a situation where customers feel afraid to switch because it’s just too complicated or time consuming.


    “Ofcom has rightly acknowledged some of these consumer issues in its review – but the task now is to get on with implementing some remedies.”


    Source: http://advanced-television.com/2016/02/25/89762/

    Police in Japan have arrested 44 people suspected of being involved in illegal Internet file-sharing. Raids in over 90 locations across the country targeted individuals suspected of downloading and distributing a wide range of content including movies, music, anime, manga and software. If convicted they face fines and up to ten years in jail.


    jailAround the world there are periodic arrests of people who are alleged to have been involved in the running of ‘pirate’ sites but the general file-sharing public is usually subjected to much lighter treatment.


    Often part of so-called ‘graduated response’ schemes, emailed warnings are the most common weapon of choice for copyright holders to get a “we’re watching you” message to relatively small time pirates. Japan, however, likes to do things a little differently.


    According to an announcement by the National Police Agency (NPA), in recent days officers across Japan carried out raids against individuals believed to have downloaded and shared a variety of content without obtaining permission from copyright holders.


    In a three-day long crackdown between February 16 and 18, police in 29 prefectures searched 93 locations, eventually arresting a total of 44 people. All are suspected of engaging in online piracy of either movies, music, anime, manga or computer software. All were detained under the Copyright Act.


    A wide variety of heavyweight industry groups were behind the action including the Motion Picture Producers Association of Japan (MPAJ), the Recording Industry Association of Japan (RIAJ), the Japan Video Software Association (JVA) and the Software Alliance (BSA).


    According to the Association of Copyright for Computer Software (ACCS) the large-scale crackdown on Internet pirates is the seventh of its type since 2009.


    Those detained include a 55-year-old office worker who along with the others faces fines between $1,785 and $89,200 (200,000 to 10 million yen) and jail sentences of up to ten years, depending on their offense.


    Until 2012 only uploading was considered a criminal offense in Japan but in that same year local authorities upgraded mere downloading to a crime carrying jail sentences of up to two years.


    It’s an important point then that police report the suspects as mostly using “shared folder” style P2P applications, a method of sharing that has remained popular in Asia despite the worldwide rise of software such as BitTorrent. Users of this software tend to both share and distribute content for extended periods of time, thus opening them up to the harshest sentences.

    The Antigua-based software company SlySoft has shut down its website and ceased sales of the popular Blu-ray ripping software AnyDVD. The action comes several days after a group of Hollywood studios and technology partners asked the U.S. Government to intervene.


    6f006.jpg


    Earlier this month AACS LA, the decryption licensing outfit founded by a group of movie studios and technology partners including Warner Bros, Disney, Microsoft and Intel, reminded the U.S. Government about the unauthorized activities of SlySoft.


    SlySoft is known for selling various copyright protection circumvention tools including the popular AnyDVD software, of which it sold tens of thousands of copies over the years.


    In 2014 AACS-LA won a court case against the software manufacturer in Antigua, where a local court found SlySoft owner Giancarla Bettini guilty of six charges under the 2003 Copyright Act and ordered him to pay a fine of $5,000 per offense. Failure to pay would result in six months in jail for each offense.


    However, despite the win for AACS not much changed. SlySoft’s owner immediately filed an appeal which effectively put the convictions on hold. Meanwhile, AnyDVD remained widely available.


    This changed yesterday when the site suddenly went blank as the domain’s main nameservers were removed. Initially it was unclear what triggered the downtime, but a few hours ago SlySoft put up a brief statement confirming an early Myce report that legal problems are the cause.


    “Due to recent regulatory requirements we have had to cease all activities relating to SlySoft Inc. We wish to thank our loyal customers/clients for their patronage over the years,” the message of the site’s homepage reads.


    b5d06a066.png


    While there’s no confirmation on the exact reason for the sudden shutdown, it’s not unlikely that AACS-LA’s pressure to the United States Trade Representative had a significant impact.


    In its request the licensing company asks the Government to place Antigua on its copyright Priority Watch List, effectively escalating it into an “international incident”.


    “Circumvention through programs such as SlySoft’s AnyDVD HD is a source for widespread, large-scale and commercial copyright infringement by users located in the United States, as well as Antigua & Barbuda, and many other countries,” AACS wrote (pdf).


    “Such circumvention also harms the legitimate consumer electronics and information technology companies that build compliant content playback devices that ‘play by the rules’.”


    With or without an intervention from the U.S. Government, it’s clear that after more than a decade the legal pressure became too much for SlySoft and its owner. Whether the software will remain offline indefinitely or if it will perhaps reappear under a new label has yet to be seen.

    I was always told (in the early days) not to use the internal flash but to use only usb flash media or hard drive, it wasn't until recently i swapped from usb to internal flash, however this was purely for picons


    Since moving the picons there the speed is noticeable and it all seems to work a lot slicker


    I am not sure if i would use flash for Kodi etc.. but hopefully someone will provide you a better answer later

    Well I got my new remote today,the Logitech Harmony Touch. I have to say I am well impressed.I had it running my Duo2 and TV in around 5 minutes.It`s very responsive and I dont even have to point it in the direction of my Duo2.I also love the fact I can change buttons to do whatever I want them to do.
    Thanx for the heads up guys.
    bo.


    Welcome to the Harmony master race :hi-five:


    There are load's of cool things you can do with it, there was a site out there (Google is your friend) that had specially made picons you could download to the remote for each channel


    Enjoy it Bo

    One more quuestion Prophet,before I take the plunge.Do you have to point the remote directly at your Vu for it to work?That`s the biggest problem I have with the Vu remotes.


    bo.



    no mate, not directly, just in the general direction of it


    trust me, once all set up and configured for your equipment you will never look back again Bo

    codar m8,did you see if your remote works with the duo2? I`m going to buy one,just need reassuring it will work.Also one other query.The description states it works with windows 7,Vista and XP. Will it work with Windows 10?


    bo.


    It 100% does if your talking about the Harmony Touch, I use one with my solo2 and all other devices, it supports all current VU models



    I have one of these, bought 2 Christmas's ago on an Amazon flash deal, can't rate it highly enough


    It runs solo2, smart tv, av amp, ps4 (basic functions only) and official sky box

    564e3.jpg


    Canal+ and beIN SPORTS have confirmed they have initiated discussions to establish a partnership in the form of an exclusive distribution agreement. Under this agreement, all beIN SPORTS channels in France would be available through CANAL+ offers exclusively. It would cover a five-year period.


    Canal+ notes that the media sector in France has seen the emergence of powerful and globalised players that represent new forms of competition for Canal+ and beIN SPORTS. The partnership would allow both channels to bring to their customers an improved offer, while providing sports competitions with a wider exposure.


    The deal would allow Canal+ Group to market a comprehensive and coherent sports offer. beIN SPORTS would benefit from the expertise and distribution know-how of Canal+ to collectively attract larger numbers of subscribers.


    Canal+ and beIN SPORTS, which would both retain their identities, brands and editorial autonomy, would continue to respond independently to sports rights tenders. In a Statement, Canal+ said it was indeed in the interest of all stake-holders (Leagues, clubs, broadcasters, etc.) that sports events were as well-funded as possible in order to provide French homes with high-quality sports shows.


    It says the partnership would also benefit and create value for the French TV and films production industry, in which CANAL+ is the largest investor in France. The agreement is subject to approval by relevant authorities, particularly the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority).


    Source : http://advanced-television.com…s-distribution-agreement/

    A prolific uploader to KickassTorrents has been told by a court that he faces fines of up to 2,000 euros a day if he continues his activities on the torrent site. The warning is a result of legal action taken by Dutch anti-piracy outfit BREIN, who previously promised they would target more and more large-scale pirates in 2016.


    Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN has been a thorn in the side of Internet pirates for many years, largely targeting sites and services to reduce content availability.


    BREIN claims to have taken down more than 340 sites in 2015, including 96 streaming platforms and 63 torrent indexes. However, for 2016 the anti-piracy outfit has committed to a strategy that makes things a little more personal for downloaders.


    In recent months BREIN has made several announcements relating to its pursuit of individual file-sharers, particularly those at the more serious end of the scale. Think those that upload a lot of content to torrent sites, rather than more casual downloaders (although BREIN isn’t ruling that out).


    Today BREIN announced its latest target, a prolific uploader to KickassTorrents (KAT), the world’s largest torrent site. Instead of tackling the individual head on, BREIN headed to court to obtain an order that would forbid him from continuing his sharing activities.


    Known online by the alias “Reinrox“, the individual allegedly uploaded around 105 torrents to KAT, half of which were popular music videos from the likes of Adele, Robin Schulz and Meghan Trainor. The remainder included songs from the Top 40, several films (including Rocky 1 to 5) and complete TV series such as CSI:Miami.


    In court papers BREIN identified Reinrox by his real name and explained that overall he had been responsible for infringing the copyrights of “many hundreds” of titles, many of which belong to BREIN’s clients.


    Stressing the damage being caused by the Kickass user’s activities, BREIN asked the court for action to bring the infringement to an end.


    “Given the scale of infringement….BREIN has well-founded fear that the respondent will continue his conduct, whether or not through another website or under another alias,” the anti-piracy group said.


    BREIN indicated that an order issued by the court for Reinrox to cease and desist under threat of a large fine would hopefully bring an end to the matter. Interestingly, BREIN said that in its experience an ex parte order yields better compliance than issuing a summons to an alleged infringer.


    “An ex parte court order reinforced with a penalty gives those whose rights have been violated the greatest possible assurance that this will not happen again,” BREIN told the court, adding that an early decision would put an end to Reinrox’s activities which “continue unabated every day without the rights holders being compensated in any way.”


    BREIN said that as long as the uploaded torrents remained live on KickassTorrents its clients would continue to suffer “substantial and irreparable damage”. This, alongside the threat of Reinrox uploading more content, justified a swift solution.


    “The nature, severity and repetitive nature of the infringements committed by the respondent justify this order being granted immediately given without the respondent being heard,” BREIN said.


    The court agreed, granting BREIN the order it required and ordering Reinrox to cease and desist within 24 hours of being notified of the decision. As can be seen from the image below, that had an immediate effect on his KickassTorrents account which was deleted two weeks ago.


    While it appears Reinrox intends to comply with the ruling from the court (BREIN says that an agreement has been signed), the Dutchman faces significant penalties should he change his mind. Court documents (pdf) indicate a fine of 2,000 euros per day for any breach, up to a maximum of 50,000 euros.


    The ruling is almost identical to one handed down last November against another KickassTorrents user said so have uploaded around 750 torrents and the signs suggest it won’t be the last.


    BREIN previously indicated that this kind of legal action would become a feature of its activities in 2016 after deploying special software to help with the task.


    “The system is registered with the Dutch data protection authority (CBP) which has issued a certified statement after examination the legality for the processing of personal data in this system by BREIN,” the group said.


    Those caught by BREIN will be required to sign a cease and desist agreement and pay a contribution towards costs and damages, which currently amount to around 12,500 euros.

    The Pirate Bay isn't particularly well-liked by the entertainment industries, but this week the notorious torrent site made a new enemy. Kanye West is reportedly outraged that his new album is being shared on the site and is now threatening legal action. Whether that will have any effect is doubtful though, as the TPB crew is not impressed.


    kanyeA few days ago Kanye West released The Life of Pablo. The album subsequently ended up on various pirate sites where it was quickly downloaded by hundreds of thousands of fans.


    A lot of media attention has focused on The Pirate Bay, where it is still listed as the most popular music download, with thousands of people actively sharing the tracks.


    Meanwhile, the news also reached Kanye West himself, who is reportedly furious that he has potentially lost millions of dollars due to the leak. He sees The Pirate Bay as one of the main culprits and is now considering taking the notorious pirate site to court.


    “Kanye is going to meet with his legal team to discuss the possibilities of starting legal action against torrent site Pirate Bay,” a source informed HollywoodLife.


    “He’s going to talk to his lawyers and see where he stands, and hopefully Tidal will partner up with him in any legal proceedings because it was supposed to be an exclusive release.”


    The Pirate Bay is not new to being the target of legal action. The site’s original founders stood trial in Sweden and late 2014 a new investigation into the site was opened after a raid on a local datacenter.


    However, The Pirate Bay (TPB) is still around today and the current staff members are not impressed by Kanye West as a person, or worried about another legal battle.


    “Kanye West is a blithering twat who has an incredible sense of self-importance. Even diehard fans are saying his new album sucks balls, but as for Mr. West suing TPB, good luck Kanye!” TPB staff member Spud17 informs TorrentFreak.


    “Our legal department will be waiting,” he adds.


    Needless to say, the TPB team has no intention of removing the album from the site. They have a clear policy not to remove any copyright-infringing material. The only files that are regularly deleted are those that link to spam or viruses.


    Kanye, meanwhile, has reportedly been hard to be around and is determined to have someone pay for the damage he’s suffered.


    “He’s touchy, angry and feels like his material was stolen. He hates the idea of people not paying for his music and feels someone needs to be held accountable for that,” the HollywoodLife source said.


    Theoretically Kanye can sue The Pirate Bay in court and win the case. However, it is unlikely that anyone associated with the site will respond, so any potential damages that are awarded will be hard to cash in.


    To a certain degree the unusually high piracy numbers can be attributed to the album’s exclusive release on the streaming service Tidal. Many fans don’t want to be tied to an expensive subscription, and even those who paid up had problems getting a copy.


    Pirate Bay co-founder Peter Sunde, who is no longer actively involved in the site, has had plenty of run-ins with copyright holders in the past, He says that West should be happy that people are going to the trouble of checking out his music in the first place.


    “The album was only released on Tidal, so I’m impressed it got leaked anyhow since fewer people pass by there than at Fort Knox. He should be happy someone cares enough to listen to it, so that they signed up for an account to stream the low quality music you get at Tidal,” Sunde says.


    If Kanye does indeed move forward with a lawsuit he joins the company of several other artists who tried before, including the late Michael Jackson, UB40, Prince and The Village People.