Posts by Prophet

    February 18, 2016


    The Nightjar, in Tiverton Road, was found to be downloading unauthorised foreign streams of Premier League games for the second time in six years.


    The Nightjar was one of twelve pubs from across the UK that had to pay a total of more than £100,000.


    Although it is not known what television supplier The Nightjar was using, the Premier League has issued legal proceedings in a civil claim against Neosat, which is accused of supplying illegal broadcast systems to facilitate pirated streams of its football matches.


    A Premier League spokesperson said Neosat is the fourth supplier of illegal football broadcasts to have been on the receiving end of civil action by the Premier League.


    "The feedback we have had from publicans in recent years is that we should be focusing on suppliers," they said.


    "We have listened and Neosat will be the fourth major supplier we have taken civil action against in the last 12 months."


    Pubs have previously attempted to avoid paying costs to BSkyB and BT, which own the live rights to Premier League matches in the UK.


    The Premier League says the fines highlight the "risks" pubs face if they try to illegally pirate football streams.


    The spokesperson said: "The actions against suppliers and pubs in recent weeks and months make it absolutely clear that there are huge risks for pubs when they enter into contracts with suppliers other than a commercial subscription with Sky Sports and BT Sport.


    "Our message to pubs is clear. Don't take the risk and call Sky and BT to find out about their latest offers for commercial premises in the UK."


    Nobody from The Nightjar was available for comment.


    The fines follow similar action against the pub six years ago, when it was one of 11 pubs in the region to have been found to be wrongfully broadcasting live matches.


    Alister and Charles Darroch, who then owned the chain of pubs, were fined £116,000 for using the internet to illegally stream their games in the pub in an attempt to avoid paying BSkyB for the legal rights.


    They were caught when Humberside Police's critical investigation team carried out a series of raids on the pubs, seizing the computer equipment.


    The father and son were found to be using an internet device to access the games via a North African television station.


    At the time, Ray Hoskin, managing director of Media Protection Services Ltd (MPS), who then represented the Premier League, said: "I am disappointed that a minority of publicans still ignore the many warnings given by the courts and ourselves over a period of years, but I am delighted for the majority who still respect the law and have suffered loss of trade by the activities of rogue neighbours."



    Source : http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk…8756811-detail/story.html

    KODI ANNOUNCES LEGAL ACTION TO SMASH PIRACY LINKS


    The group behind the Kodi media player used by millions to watch movies, TV shows and live sports say they are sick of being linked to piracy. Those using the Kodi name to promote infringing activity in future face action for trademark abuse but it won't be a battle easily won.


    9d3fbb102a1a60234.jpg


    Over the past several years the Kodi media player has grown to become one of the most-used pieces of software through which people can stream, download and otherwise obtain copyright infringing content.


    While millions have heard of BitTorrent, living rooms around the world are now more likely to have a device running Kodi, largely due to how easily the software is run on smart-enabled TVs.


    Interestingly, the companies behind both BitTorrent and Kodi have a similar problem. Through the actions of their users, both sets of developers are up to their necks in piracy-related news and both would prefer not to be since neither has done anything illegal.


    BitTorrent Inc. has made huge efforts on the PR front to try and educate the masses, with limited effect. Now Team Kodi say they will do the same but if the early signs are a prediction of the future, this will be a tough challenge.


    The problem in a nutshell


    Kodi is just a media player, it carries no content. However, Kodi has the ability to run third party plugins that in many instances make infringing content available to the user. So, when people load Kodi with plugins recommended by a friend and then see the latest movies listed, they believe that Kodi – and the people behind Kodi – are the ones providing them with the movies.


    Needless to say, for Team Kodi this is a huge problem. Not only are they already wrongly associated with huge amounts of infringing activity, the installed addons often break or do not function as advertised. When users get problems they head off to the Kodi forums and vent – to entirely the wrong people.


    adebf.png


    “Every day a new user shows up on the Kodi forum, totally unaware that the free movies they’re watching have been pirated and surprised to discover that Kodi itself isn’t providing those movies,” says XBMC Foundation President and Kodi Product Manager Nathan Betzen.


    But while those who install Kodi on their own machines and obtain the addons themselves probably understand that Team Kodi isn’t to blame for their piracy, there are countless thousands – maybe millions – of people out there who are entirely clueless.


    That’s because they are buying hardware devices from places such as eBay and Amazon with Kodi ready set-up with potentially infringing third party addons.


    More often than not, these products are advertised as “fully loaded” and less subtly as “Powered by Kodi”. The latter infuriates Team Kodi, especially when the devices fail to operate as promised.


    d1bb1dedd5b99a27.png


    “There have been a wave of sellers who decided to make a quick buck modifying Kodi, installing broken piracy add-ons, advertising that Kodi let’s you watch free movies and TV, and then vanishing when the user buys the box and finds out that the add-on they were sold on was a crummy, constantly breaking mess,” Betzen explains.


    “These sellers are dragging users into the world of piracy without their knowledge and at the same time convincing new users that Kodi is a buggy mess, because they never differentiate Kodi from 3rd party add-ons.”


    By now there are millions of Kodi users and although its difficult if not impossible to put numbers on them, it’s probably fair to assume that the majority are using the software for piracy. So what can the Kodi team possibly do?


    Bring out the trademark banhammer


    Well, the team has a plan which involves dissociating the Kodi name from infringing acts. The XBMC Foundation owns the ‘Kodi’ trademark and is legally entitled to chase down people who use it without permission.


    9cc58242.png


    They announced an intention to do so in 2014 but it appears things have gotten so bad since that core Kodi developers have threatened to quit unless something more aggressive is done.


    “This means we will issue trademark takedown notices anywhere we think the likelihood for confusion is high. If you are selling a box on your website designed to trick users into thinking broken add-ons come from us and work perfectly, so you can make a buck, we’re going to do everything we can to stop you,” Betzen warns.


    “If you are making a video in which you claim to be a Kodi developer or Kodi team member or you are just using the Kodi name while assuring users that some pirate add-on is totally legal and isn’t going to break next week, we will do everything we can to take you down.”


    That’s right. Team Kodi aren’t just going to target sellers of piracy-configured boxes, but even people putting up YouTube videos that use the Kodi trademark without permission.


    “Most of all, we are tired of a thousand different salesmen and Youtubers making money off ruining our name. And there are even more people out there seeking to make a quick buck by selling ads on videos about getting free movies and TV while using Kodi in their channel name to make their content seem official, as if those videos are coming from us.”


    There has already been vigorous debate in the Kodi forums over how far the team will be prepared to go, with suggestions that even people monetizing “Kodi tips” could become a target.


    b97b31fd3d0d.png


    Only time will tell how this will play out, but the Kodi team are under no illusions that this is a huge task. To that end they’re enrolling supporters to help them with their trademark offensive against both sellers and YouTubers.


    “If you see somebody selling a box that’s ‘fully loaded’ or comes with the phrase ‘Free movies and TV with Kodi,’ please, ask them to stop. And let us know. It’s OK to sell a vanilla Kodi box. It’s OK to sell a fully loaded box that doesn’t have Kodi installed or fully rebrands Kodi to something else entirely. It is not OK to sell a fully loaded Kodi box,” the team clarify.


    “If you see a Youtuber using the Kodi logo as part of his channel, constantly marketing Kodi as a source of free movies, ask him to stop pretending to be us and dragging our name through the muck. And, of course, let us know. Who knows, maybe the Youtuber has no idea that he or she is causing so many problems and a conversation might solve them.”


    Interestingly, while Team Kodi are clearly sick of being connected to piracy, they aren’t actually condemning what the user does.


    “Team Kodi maintains an officially neutral stance on what users do with their own software. Kodi is open source software, and as long as the GPL is followed, you are welcome to do with it as you like,” Betzen explains.


    “So while we don’t love this use of Kodi, as long as you know what illegal and potentially dangerous things you are getting yourself into and accept the fact that the Team will not be providing you with any support, then you are welcome to do what you like.”


    There’s no doubt that the Kodi team has a mountain to climb and at this point it seems unlikely they will ever truly get to the top. That being said, it will be interesting to see them try as this is a unique situation that few have ever faced before.

    82-YEAR-OLD GREAT-GRANDMOTHER IS A PIRATE, TROLLS SAY


    People who've managed to live for more than eight decades should be enjoying a peaceful and uncomplicated existence but for UK-based Sky customer Sheila Drew things are not so straightforward. She's being accused of being an Internet pirate - and has two letters and a £600 bill to prove it.


    n September 2014, TorrentFreak became aware of a UK court case between TCYK LLP and Internet service provider Sky.


    TCYK stands for The Company You Keep and is the title of a film of the same name directed and starring Robert Redford who appears alongside Susan Sarandon and Shia LeBeouf.


    After presenting evidence to the court, TCYK LLP were granted an order which forced Sky to hand over the names and addresses of subscribers alleged to have downloaded the movie without permission.


    In March 2015, Sky began warning its customers they were being targeted.


    By last summer Sky customers were receiving accusations of Internet piracy through the post followed by letters demanding hundreds of pounds in compensation.


    Having targeted the bill payer (the only person they have the name of) TCYK indicated in their letter that they had no proof that a specific person had committed the offense. If the bill payer didn’t do anything wrong, they should say who did, TCYK indicated somewhat optimistically.


    But just like all of these companies employing a carpet-bombing approach to copyright enforcement, things were bound to go wrong for TCYK at some point. Thanks to the BBC we can how see how embarrassing things can get.


    Sheila Drew lives in the Black Country, a previously industrial area in the heart of the West Midlands. She’s an 82-year-old pensioner and TCYK are currently pressuring her to pay a £600 fine after claiming her Internet connection was used to download The Company You Keep.


    According to an initial letter sent to Sheila by TCYK in November 2015, the alleged infringement took place on April 25, 2013, some two years and six months earlier. Of course, remembering that far back for anyone would be a considerable feat of memory but for an octogenarian one might expect even more difficulty.


    Nevertheless, TCYK have persisted with their allegations and have just sent Sheila a second letter. She still denies their claims.


    “I’m upset to have been accused of something I didn’t do… how many other people has this happened to?” she told the BBC.


    It’s unclear whether TCYK will have both the decency and common sense to nip this PR disaster in the bud. But for Michael Coyle, a solicitor advocate at Lawdit Solicitors in Southampton, these kinds of allegations are nothing new.


    Speaking with TF last evening Coyle said that these kinds of allegations are “typical of the scam” and as a result he’s being inundated with requests from people like Sheila seeking to defend themselves.


    A few months ago Coyle began defending people in return for a charitable donation but now charges less than £100 to deal with a case from start to finish.


    “I’ve raised some £20k for charity and have some 350-400 clients, having also spoken to twice that many,” Coyle informs TorrentFreak.


    “We’ve started to charge £75 plus vat just to cover costs but it still makes the whole aspect ridiculous.”


    But while criticizing the companies engaged in so-called “speculative invoicing”, Coyle also says that court orders which enable thousands of Internet subscribers to be targeted in this fashion are also part of the problem.


    “It’s probably too late to complain but it does highlight the harm and wide scale abuses caused by large volume IP address disclosures,” Coyle concludes.


    But for now there is absolutely no sign that courts are prepared to reign in the activities of copyright trolls in the UK. The best people can hope for is that the “speculative invoicing” business model collapses under the strain of people refusing to pay, but that will take strength from those being targeted and trolls can be very threatening.

    Thank you. We went for the Vu+ Solo2 from World of Sat. Amazing service and lightening fast delivery. Now I've got to find the setup tutorials I used!



    Very good choice Kevalino


    I went for the same box a while back and am over the moon with it, so many things you can do with it

    Premier League bosses in talks to block the illegal streaming of matches on the internet

    Around one million people watch illegal streams of Premier League games
    Premier League in talks with cyber-security companies in bid to crackdown
    Sky and BT Sport forking out £5.1b for rights over the next three seasons
    A 'virtual barrier' could block UK users watching foreign streams of games



    Premier League bosses are in talks with cyber-security companies in a bid to crack down on the illegal streaming of matches on the internet.
    Illegal coverage of Premier League fixtures, especially the traditional Saturday 3pm games, are watched by around one million viewers each week.
    But with broadcasters Sky and BT Sport forking out £5.1billion for rights over the next three seasons, the Premier League are understandably keen to put an end to the practice.


    3c1e5af713cea1a8c9d83e.jpg


    According to The Times, users in the United Kingdom would be prevented from tuning into foreign streams thanks to a 'virtual online barrier' known as geofencing.
    Saturday games traditionally kicking off at 3pm are not shown live on television in the UK but are watched worldwide.



    Broadcasters based in Australia, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates all show matches as do other companies in America.
    The Premier League have previously worked with Net Result, Irdeto and ID Inquiries, successfully blocking nearly 50,000 streams.


    ac6bbcd77357.jpg


    Source : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/spo…ing-matches-internet.html

    thank you for the reccomendation codar, do you have any idea if this would work with Blackhole without the need for drivers ? I have never used VIX and i am one of those old fashioned types that sticks to what I know


    thanks again for taking the time to reply

    Hi guys, having some network problems at the moment, i have always used hard wired to the hub/router, but the hub/router seems to be the problem


    I have home plug's here also but they use ethernet so obviously the same affect


    So all that said i was looking for a USB wifi adaptor to just plug in the back


    I looked at the official VU one and it's £30 which seems a lot more than some of the other one's on the market


    I am unsure if Blackhole will recognise these devices automatically, so this is also a consideration as well


    Recommendations appreciated please, please note i am concerned about driver issues so need something that is plug and play


    Thanks

    PAYPAL STARTS BANNING VPN AND SMARTDNS SERVICES


    After cutting off file-hosting sites and Usenet providers, PayPal is now taking aim at VPN and SmartDNS services. The payment processor states that services which can be used to bypass measures to prevent copyright infringement, such as geo-blockades, are violating its terms of service.


    d2858e00ab31.jpg


    PayPal is widely known for their aggressive stance towards BitTorrent sites, Usenet providers and file-hosting services, but VPN, proxy and SmartDNS providers might now suffer the same fate too.


    This week PayPal stopped accepting payments for a company that provides VPN and SmartDNS tools, stating that these may facilitate copyright infringement.


    So-called “unblocker” tools can be used to bypass geo-filtering blockades which Netflix and other video platforms have in place.


    According to the message PayPal sent to UnoTelly and possibly others, these services are against the company’s policies because they help users to bypass copyright restrictions.


    “Under the PayPal Acceptable Use Policy, PayPal may not be used to send or receive payments for items that infringe or violate any copyright, trademark, right of publicity or privacy, or any other proprietary right under the laws of any jurisdiction,” PayPal’s email reads.


    “This includes transactions for any device or technological measure that descrambles a scrambled work, decrypts an encrypted work or otherwise avoids, bypasses, removes, deactivates or impairs a technological measure without the authority of the copyright owner.”


    PayPal informs the affected business(es) that their accounts have been permanently limited and that this decision can’t be appealed. This means that they have to switch to other payment processing providers.


    UnoTelly informs TorrentFreak that the decision came as a shock, without any type of prior notice. The company is disappointed and sees the move as a direct attack on open and unrestricted Internet access.


    “We are disappointed at PayPal’s unilateral action and the way it acted without prior warning. We provide both DNS resolution and secure VPN services. Our services are network relays that connect people around the world,” UnoTelly’s Nicholas Lin says.


    Under PayPal’s policy every VPN and SmartDNS service is at risk of losing its PayPal account. However, it seems likely that the company will mainly take action against companies that market themselves as an “unblocker” service.


    UnoTelly, for example, specifically mentions its ability to bypass geo-blocks imposed by streaming sites such as Netflix and Hulu.


    PayPal’s actions are not an isolated incident. They come a few weeks after Netflix started to increase its crackdown on VPN services and other unblockers, as requested by copyright holders. It would be no surprise if copyright holders are also behind PayPal’s recent move.


    73aff8f.png