as title in thread . Yes or not ?
For configuration with local card + some "remote"
LOADBALANCER yes or not ?
- altotre
- Thread is marked as Resolved.
-
-
Everytime it's enabled = freezes. Maybe it's bad configuration.
-
Yes. Loadbalancer reduces the load on the network but will increase your response times.
Use this formula to have better a good balance between ECM requests and response times
Number of best readers = number of total readers / 5 (rounded to the lowest number)
Example, you have 10 readers, select 2 as number of best readers.
Make sure that you prioritize your local card by using preferlocalcards = 2
-
Yes. Loadbalancer reduces the load on the network but will increase your response times.
Use this formula to have better a good balance between ECM requests and response times
Number of best readers = number of total readers / 5 (rounded to the lowest number)
Example, you have 10 readers, select 2 as number of best readers.
Make sure that you prioritize your local card by using preferlocalcards = 2
What configuration do you suggest for
load balancing mode:
0 = load balance disabled, ECMs go to all readers (default)
1 = fastest reader first, after 5 ECMs the reader with the fastest
response time will be selected
2 = oldest reader first, reader with the longest no answer
3 = lowest usage level, the usage level will be calculated by the
sum of 5 ECMS response times, the higher a reader is busy, the
higher is usage level
I have 4/5 readers. Number of best readers should be 1/2?
-
here is my setting for proxy server non local
lb_mode = 10
lb_save = 100
lb_nbest_readers = 5
lb_nfb_readers = 5
lb_min_ecmcount = 10
lb_max_ecmcount = 100
lb_reopen_seconds = 5
lb_retrylimit = 50
lb_stat_cleanup = 168
OSCam Support Forum
Configs, discussion, downloads and guides for OSCam Softcam.
Participate now!
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!