LOADBALANCER yes or not ?

There are 4 replies in this Thread which was already clicked 920 times. The last Post () by sagher.

  • as title in thread . Yes or not ?
    For configuration with local card + some "remote"

    Nokia MM 9800
    Telewire 3001 + all CI (seca aston , Viaccess ,Irdeto , DiabloCam)
    Topfield TF 7710

    QBoxHd duolabs
    VU+ Zero
    Vu+ duo2
    GIgablue Trio 4K

  • Yes. Loadbalancer reduces the load on the network but will increase your response times.


    Use this formula to have better a good balance between ECM requests and response times


    Number of best readers = number of total readers / 5 (rounded to the lowest number)


    Example, you have 10 readers, select 2 as number of best readers.

    Make sure that you prioritize your local card by using preferlocalcards = 2

    Edited once, last by TigTex ().

  • What configuration do you suggest for

    load balancing mode:


    0 = load balance disabled, ECMs go to all readers (default)

    1 = fastest reader first, after 5 ECMs the reader with the fastest

    response time will be selected

    2 = oldest reader first, reader with the longest no answer

    3 = lowest usage level, the usage level will be calculated by the

    sum of 5 ECMS response times, the higher a reader is busy, the

    higher is usage level


    I have 4/5 readers. Number of best readers should be 1/2?

  • here is my setting for proxy server non local


    lb_mode = 10

    lb_save = 100

    lb_nbest_readers = 5

    lb_nfb_readers = 5

    lb_min_ecmcount = 10

    lb_max_ecmcount = 100

    lb_reopen_seconds = 5

    lb_retrylimit = 50

    lb_stat_cleanup = 168

OSCam Support Forum

Configs, discussion, downloads and guides for OSCam Softcam.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!