Work open atv 7.3 ?
Works everywhere except VTi
Work open atv 7.3 ?
Works everywhere except VTi
Would it be possible to add channels from multistalker to history zap selector?
Would it be possible to add channels from multistalker to history zap selector?
What is "Multistalker" and does it use InfoBar.instance.servicelist
Multistalker is iptv plugin that uses exteplayer3 for playback. I am not sure about the 2nd question but my guess would be no since those channels are not in the e2 channel list but in the plugin itself.
I am not sure about the 2nd question but my guess would be no since those channels are not in the e2 channel list but in the plugin itself.
In this case, you need to contact the developers of the "Multistalker" plugin so that they remake the code and add the addition of broadcasts to InfoBar.instance.servicelist at the start of browsing.
p.s. Why do you need "Multistalker" if there is - RE: [Plugin] E2m3u2bouquet with which HistoryZAP works ...
It is for different purposes. m3u2bouquet is for importing bouquets from the m3u and the multistalker plugin is for stalking iptv portals by faking the device mac address
the multistalker plugin is for stalking iptv portals by faking the device mac address
it's clear what it is like for MAG250 e.t.c ... In any case, you need to contact its developer and explain to him that he needs to "register" launched broadcasts in "InfoBar.instance.servicelist" ... Moreover, it is necessary to register only unique records, moving the current one being viewed to the end of the list ... in general, in the source texts of the Enigma2 code, he can see all this. "Multistalker" code should start the broadcast exactly as the Enigma2 code does when choosing a channel to watch ....
UPDATE
1.0.13
A small improvement in the part of displaying the orbital position for srviceref OSCAM iCAM. If the entries in your bouquet are, for example, like this
#SERVICE 1:0:1:149d:7db:2:21:0:0:0:http%3A//127.0.0.1%3A17999/1%3A0%3A1%3A149d%3A7db%3A2%3A11a0000%3A0%3A0%3A0%3A:Sky Showcase +1
#DESCRIPTION Sky Showcase +1
Then the orbital position will be correctly displayed in the switching list. Previously it displayed as "IPTV"
UPDATE
1.0.14
1) Reworked the code responsible for selecting similar channels. More accurate search for similar channels
2) Redesigned skin
Снимок экрана 2023-08-25 в 21.34.55.pngСнимок экрана 2023-08-25 в 21.36.41.png
For arm or mipsel receivers?
For arm or mipsel receivers?
For any architectures and images based on any version of Python, except VTi
Had to revert back to 1.0.13, 1.0.14 has problem with slower loading. When I press the shortcut for the plugin on 1.0.13 it pops nearly instantly but on the 1.0.14 I have to wait a few seconds
Had to revert back to 1.0.13, 1.0.14 has problem with slower loading. When I press the shortcut for the plugin on 1.0.13 it pops nearly instantly but on the 1.0.14 I have to wait a few seconds
On what volume of records in favorite bouquets? It is very unlikely that there is a noticeable difference between .0.13 and 0.14
I've "sawed" the functionality a little more here ... and abandoned the standard form of EPGEventview ... added my own .. where there is all the info about the channel .. description of the broadcast, and the ability to automatically translate the description into the GUI interface language of the image used
Idk what volume but I use modified ciefp settings 5w-42e, I trimmed it down a lot from the channels I don't use. Those changes made the plugin heavier a lot on Zgemma H9S it is unbearable you have to wait 2-3 seconds for kt to show up it's just too much compared to the previous version.
have to wait 2-3 seconds
I added some "counters" to the "similar" search algorithm
Снимок экрана 2023-08-30 в 19.45.53.png
[ActionMap] Keymap 'HistoryZapSelectorActions' -> Action = 'findSimilar'.
[1693413826.46454] Start search similar to -> Прямий (youtube)
[1693413826.7250786] Processed services -> 4729
Found similar -> 5
The log shows that when searching for similar channels on "Прямий (youtube)", 4729 "services" were processed and 5 were selected ... The total time spent on everything was
~ 260 microseconds .... With any options on my 4725 channels, I never got more than 1 second
[ActionMap] Keymap 'HistoryZapSelectorActions' -> Action = 'findSimilar'.
[1693414444.446547] Start search similar to -> ® Bridge TV
[1693414444.7398884] Processed services -> 4729
Found similar -> 12
[ActionMap] Keymap 'HistoryZapSelectorActions' -> Action = 'findSimilar'.
[1693414506.9276166] Start search similar to -> ® Amedia 1
[1693414507.194504] Processed services -> 4729
Found similar -> 13
It is not time spent for similar epg search that is the problem but the fact that when I press my hotkey for the plugin it isn't nearly as snappy as previous version, just feels heavier sluggish.
UPDATE
1.0.15
1) Added support for LCD skins. If your receiver has an LCD, then the information from the channel selection list will be duplicated on it
2) On the "Info" page, an online translation of the event description into the GUI language of the Enigma2 image has been added
3) I tried to speed up the "similar"-selection algorithm as much as possible ... Check it
4) Skins have been reworked again. I like it better this way =)
5) Added translations for different locales.
Снимок экрана 2023-09-05 в 06.35.16.pngBildschirmfoto 2023-09-04 um 18.37.30.png
Снимок экрана 2023-09-05 в 06.35.30.pngСнимок экрана 2023-09-05 в 06.35.42.png
Bildschirmfoto 2023-09-04 um 18.44.15.pngBildschirmfoto 2023-09-04 um 18.45.31.png
Just tested 1.0.15, new features are cool but 1.0.13 much quicker responsiveness
but 1.0.13 much quicker responsiveness
1) You have a choice =) stay on 1.0.13 or use the new "chips" of the plugin
2) This plugin is posted by me on several forums ... You are the only one who talks about some kind of slow "responsiveness" of the search algorithm for similar names
3) In a few posts above, I gave you an example of the algorithm for selecting similar channel names using the example of my favorite bouquets, consisting of more than 4500 entries - the sampling speed was from 200 to 500 milliseconds ... In addition to the "empirical" comparison by eye, you never indicated either the number of records on which your selection was made ..... not an example of your favorite bouquets ... nothing ... Just words ... How can I help you? See paragraph 1 of this post =)
p,s, In addition to the speed of the similar names selection algorithm, compare its accuracy with accuracy in 1.0.13 and the latest version
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!