There are 40 replies in this Thread which was already clicked 4,615 times. The last Post () by Rinnegan Six.
PS- each of the previous two copy/paste C8 codes were retrieved from 5-minute TS recordings obtained from Edision OS Mini 4K.
Does the decoder tell you if it's a Biss-2 or not? Whether by caid (numbers, letters) or directly by name.
Does that decoder allow you to record the entire TS? Full TS is the best option.
They're both BISS1. As far as I know, it is recording the entire TS file.
new version with custom max c8 parameter, useful to speed up search
For now, I'm sticking with the first version of Python. This v0.2 isn't as efficient. I tested it with a TS file (an Argentinian soccer match) of almost 6 GB, and v0.2 couldn't find C8, while the first version could, although it's not as fast as CSA v2. Even so, I still prefer the first version of Python, preferably in executable form.
Captura de pantalla 2025-11-02 221850.png Captura de pantalla 2025-11-02 222520.png
new version with custom max c8 parameter, useful to speed up search
For now, I'm sticking with the first version of Python. This v0.2 isn't as efficient. I tested it with a TS file (an Argentinian soccer match) of almost 6 GB, and v0.2 couldn't find C8, while the first version could, although it's not as fast as CSA v2. Even so, I still prefer the first version of Python, preferably in executable form.
Captura de pantalla 2025-11-02 221850.png Captura de pantalla 2025-11-02 222520.png
Ok thanks for the feedback!
Would anyone be able to post feedback on whether the C8 keys I posted using rush1 tool produce a CW?
nope
CW not found
It seems you need a bigger RBT
Would anyone be able to post feedback on whether the C8 keys I posted using rush1 tool produce a CW?
It seems you need a bigger RBT
I'm not sure what you mean? I'm just posting the C8 from the findc8.py program. I'm not running it through any RBT files
finding C8 is not always successfull but sometimes it works :)
3,75 TB for the 3 tables, however majority of feeds are using FF table which is around 1 TB.
You need an Nvidia card btw
Why is the Nvidia card important? I don't understand why the CW processing uses a video card and not CPU?
the CW search is using rainbow tables and they requires high computation capacity and they are optimized for CUDA which is availabe only on Nvidia Cards. Standard CPU computation will take years. You can try the CW search using CPU and CW lists (there are other thread on this topics) but it's not efficient and with low success rate compared to rainbow tables.
Which NVIDIA card models are best?
hard to tell.. generally speaking the more cuda cores they have the better it is. I have an old GeForce GT 750 with 384 cuda cores and I can search a CW withing seconds with Rv2 tables and minutes for v1 tables
satman2019 You can create your own CSA (v1) chains; the more powerful the graphics card, the less time it will take. With v1, there's a higher probability of finding the CW than with v2.
There's also a modified tool (for creating chains) focused on laptops, which creates chains very quickly. The problem with this tool is that it doesn't sign the created chains correctly, and they can't be joined. Perhaps someone could fix this if there's interest.
Searching online, you can find almost anything in modified tools, even for finding C8s without a graphics card. This C8 search tool published by rush1 is very good, although one small detail is that for a TP with several channels, each with a different Biss key, it can be tricky to determine which channel's C8 key belongs to which channel. A section for PIDs would be better. But even so, it's a very good C8 search tool .
satman2019 You can create your own CSA (v1) chains; the more powerful the graphics card, the less time it will take. With v1, there's a higher probability of finding the CW than with v2.
There's also a modified tool (for creating chains) focused on laptops, which creates chains very quickly. The problem with this tool is that it doesn't sign the created chains correctly, and they can't be joined. Perhaps someone could fix this if there's interest.
Searching online, you can find almost anything in modified tools, even for finding C8s without a graphics card. This C8 search tool published by rush1 is very good, although one small detail is that for a TP with several channels, each with a different Biss key, it can be tricky to determine which channel's C8 key belongs to which channel. A section for PIDs would be better. But even so, it's a very good C8 search tool .
I have a version that reads the PMT to determine video/audio pid but still not working well.
Yes, of course, you can try it. Lists can be useful for a certain period of time. That's why new lists with updated keys are needed from time to time.
If you want a better chance, use tables. You don't need to download them all. The most commonly used one is FFh.
Some of the lists they publish are focused on specific satellites; I don't know if that's the case here. I think it was 0.8W, but in certain feeds (football), each time they change the key, they don't change the entire key, only certain bytes that I think are related to dates—I'm not sure if it was the day or the month, something like that.
The person who compiles these lists, or someone who knows, could explain it better.
Display MoreWhich NVIDIA card models are best?
hard to tell.. generally speaking the more cuda cores they have the better it is. I have an old GeForce GT 750 with 384 cuda cores and I can search a CW withing seconds with Rv2 tables and minutes for v1 tables
Is this what you have? This one says "GTX" not "GT" not sure if that matters-
mine is GeForce GT 750M, not sure it's the same as the one in the link as mine is laptop one
I’m using this app because my CSA v1 doesn't support the RTX 5060. It scans pretty fast; however, it sometimes returns invalid Crypt8 results (for example, it doesn't display all PIDs, which leads to confusing fake Crypt8
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
