Please recommend me a good Enigma receiver box

so..? it is "info tread" and not problem one, so better call it HydePark ;-)

gigablue uhd top notch

Dreambox Two ...the Best

I wouldn't take a VU or DM
it also depends on the money
Gigablue UE 4K good value for money
if cheaper Gigablue Trio 4K
or the new Gigablue UHD Quad
with OpenAtv 7.4

My suggestion if you decide to go for the Octagon SF8008 is not to get the Supreme version, many people including me have had serious problems with it. It's buggy.

I think original person who asked may have bought new reciever by now 11 months ago since he asked.

Yeah. The SF8008 does seem to have quality control issues and rapid failures for many.
With the added low symbol rate issues. Supposedly fixed with the next model.
I would wait on getting one.
And hey. What VU+ does a blindscan as well as the osmio4k lineup with the Availink AVL6261 tuner? The same as the SF8008 has.

I have octagon supreme sf8008 not satisfactory for me is not locking feeds 7 east ...

I have also edision os mini 4k does not have support for egami, it has openatv and tnap but i still testing this tnap firmware

I have not seen yet any new receiver for 2025 except from gigablue ... and v3 octagon ...

Quote from supwiddiss

Yeah. The SF8008 does seem to have quality control issues and rapid failures for many.
With the added low symbol rate issues. Supposedly fixed with the next model.
I would wait on getting one.
And hey. What VU+ does a blindscan as well as the osmio4k lineup with the Availink AVL6261 tuner? The same as the SF8008 has.

No, no, no, do not buy the SF8008 'SUPREME' model, it falls way short of the earlier SF8008 which has the Silabs Si2166D tuners installed. The Avalink tuners in the 'SUPREME' are less reception sensitive and the Blindscan results are very, very unreliable. only use mine for skin and image testing!! The Uclan Ustym 4k Pro Twin is truly superb, also has the Silabs tuners and is basically a 'copy' of the proven earlier SF8008. We will see what the supposed new release of another SF8008 reveals!

Quote from dish

Quote from supwiddiss

Yeah. The SF8008 does seem to have quality control issues and rapid failures for many.
With the added low symbol rate issues. Supposedly fixed with the next model.
I would wait on getting one.
And hey. What VU+ does a blindscan as well as the osmio4k lineup with the Availink AVL6261 tuner? The same as the SF8008 has.

No, no, no, do not buy the SF8008 'SUPREME' model, it falls way short of the earlier SF8008 which has the Silabs Si2166D tuners installed. The Avalink tuners in the 'SUPREME' are less reception sensitive and the Blindscan results are very, very unreliable. only use mine for skin and image testing!! The Uclan Ustym 4k Pro Twin is truly superb, also has the Silabs tuners and is basically a 'copy' of the proven earlier SF8008. We will see what the supposed new release of another SF8008 reveals!

I have 'stewed' on your response so I could compose myself. So, here goes.
Starting with the TNAP image. Which could be considered a fork of, or modeled after openpli.
Options have been added to allow at least 3 different tuner drivers to be used. And an option to allow display of received frequency below lock.
I believe the osmio4k series is better suited. As Edision stepped up to provide different tuner drivers. It was mentioned someplace here that in the early release of the receiver. Edision sent me at least five different tuner drivers to test out.
Not any documentation with them. Just "try them and let us know how they perform".

So. If you don't know. Or have tried. The TNAP drivers are able to be used with at least OpenViX. Perhaps others.
In my case, in the /lib/modules/5.15.0/extra directory. The AVL6261.ko resides.
In ViX I have appended the two additional drivers AVL6261.lowsr and AVL6261.t2mi. Leaving the original stock driver in place.
And its easy to FTP into the box. Rename the stock driver....well....AVL6261.stock. And I'm suure you get the rest.
A reboot of the box seems best. And the driver you swapped is used.
I did not try it with openatv. Nor because I'm not a programmer. Would I know how to try to stick the below-lock module in using Vix.

So. I haven't been able to unpack an SF8008 image. It would be interesting to see is the driver is also named .ko .
Nor the Uclan image. A tip on that would be cool.
I own neither. Not yet anyway.
But I do invite you to try the different tuner drivers for the osmio out.

If the Uclan is exactly like the SF8008 but using different images. Exactly meaning hardware and general construction. Sans the nvme drive slot.
What would prevent you from performing the same tuner driver swap to see if in fact it's the receiver. Or the driver the image creator just had on hand.

I wonder also. Folks say that one tuner shows different signal levels versus others.
But wait. ALL of the amplification is done in the lnb, lnbf. And sent over coax as the intermediate frequency.
So if the signal leaves the dish at a certain level. And enters the receiver at close to the same. Get it?
I know that different images display different signal levels and the only thing that has changed is the image. Right?
Also I've been steered to believe that displayed signal levels are a software thing.
Like, let's say. One pressure gauge is pegged at 150psi and another is pegged at 80 psi. The gauge with lesser full scale reading will give you a better resolution throughout the sweep than the higher rated one. Even though you only regulate the pressure to a max. of 80psi for both. Side by-side.
So, am I correct? Signal level display is a relative thing. When. In my world of things RF. 0 dB on a scale at a rated microvolts is a given.

But. Anyway. I've heard many different out of box and shortly after user experiences of both the Octagon and Uclan receivers.
Is it the bootloader that would keep a person from flashing an image designed for either one, On either one? They're "identical". Right?
And probably made side by side and pc boards cooked in the same oven. Schenzhen must be an absolute trip to visit.

So. Open for a good and intelligent conversation on this one. All I know is before I purchased my Edision OS MIO 4K, I did a bit of research.
The AVL6261 tuner seemed tops in blindscan performance. Edision did not go stagnant on development after the sale.
And VU+ and "The Sopnsor" could not and would not lift a single finger to inform me what tuner driver was in the tuner-du-jour of....my choice....if purchased and shipped. A big, big bummer. So. The rabbit hole and the big old funnel of decisions led me to the mio. And I could not be more pleased.