local drops

There are 11 replies in this Thread which was already clicked 861 times. The last Post () by dekelster.

  • I have recently changed to fibre broadband. Since doing this I have noticed an increase in the number of active peers. Likely due to my ping etc improving.
    I have a total of 30 peers using VU duo as server with oscam/cccam.


    Now I notice that my main local drops quite a bit from my server :( Is this due to it being hammered? How many active peers is healthy & stable for vu duo and my card?


    Current Usage (ECM requests/h) : 3553
    Average Usage (ECM requests/h) : 9787


    Thanks for reading, any help appreciated.

  • You say your local drops do you mean a peers line is taking priorty over yours or is your card not being read at all ? Is your oscam config set to prefer local cards, tbh 30 peers seems to be quite alot for a receiver server to me perhaps you can you post your cofigs so we take a better look and try and help a little more thanks.

  • Its not being read, until I restart cam. Yes, prefer local is 1.
    yeah 30 likely is too much. Hopefully the new VU when it comes out can handle 30 :)
    Post configs later.


    cheers

  • As an option, why dont you get yourself a oldish desktop pc and run from there? i got a dual core 4gig ram one off ebay for £22!! its like the old office flat type and have to say its an awsome unit for what i use it for and never had a issue, just an option for you to consider, and could take the strain off your box maybe??

  • Certainly an option mate as I have lots of old PC components. Just reluctant to step onto the PC server minefield and have limited time atm with the little un round my feet most days.

  • Trust me if i can setup a pc server up anyone can ofcourse your get all the you want of the site your not alone my friend



    Certainly an option mate as I have lots of old PC components. Just reluctant to step onto the PC server minefield and have limited time atm with the little un round my feet most days.

  • still drops every few hours.


    Here is oscam log


    2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r >> OSCam << cardserver log switched, version 1.20-unstable_svn, build #6059 (mips-tuxbox-linux)
    2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r version=1.20-unstable_svn, build #6059, system=mips-tuxbox-linux, nice=-1
    2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r client max. idle=120 sec, debug level=0
    2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r max. logsize=10 Kb, loghistorysize=4096 bytes
    2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r client timeout=5000 ms, fallback timeout=2500 ms, cache delay=120 ms
    2012/07/07 21:39:56 575860 r ERROR in IO_Serial_Read (errno=0 Success)
    2012/07/07 21:39:59 575860 r ERROR in IO_Serial_Read (errno=0 Success)
    2012/07/07 21:39:59 575860 r [videoguard2-reader] classD0 ins40: (-2) status not ok c4 a8
    2012/07/07 21:39:59 575860 r Error processing ecm for caid 0963, srvid 2582 (servicename: 0963:2582 unknown) on reader ***uk.


    and in the messages:



    Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F35754 seq 81F35754 - 81F35CB8
    Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F35CB8 seq 81F35CB8 - 81F3621C
    Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3621C seq 81F3621C - 81F3626C
    Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3626C seq 81F3626C - 81F367D0
    Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F36884 seq 81F36DE8 - 81F3734C
    Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F36884 seq 81F3734C - 81F378B0
    Jul 7 21:28:06 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F36884 seq 81F378B0 - 81F37E14
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F36884 seq 81F37E14 - 81F38378
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F36DE8 seq 81F36DE8 - 81F3734C
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3734C seq 81F3734C - 81F378B0
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F378B0 seq 81F378B0 - 81F37E14
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F37E14 seq 81F37E14 - 81F38378
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F39922 - 81F39E86
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F39E86 - 81F3A3EA
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F3A3EA - 81F3A94E
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F3A94E - 81F3AEB2
    Jul 7 21:28:07 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F393BE seq 81F3AEB2 - 81F3AEDF
    Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F39922 seq 81F39922 - 81F39E86
    Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F39E86 seq 81F39E86 - 81F3A3EA
    Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3A3EA seq 81F3A3EA - 81F3A94E
    Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3A94E seq 81F3A94E - 81F3AEB2
    Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: ofo requeuing : rcv_next 81F3AEB2 seq 81F3AEB2 - 81F3AEDF
    Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F3AF18 seq 81F3B47C - 81F3B9E0
    Jul 7 21:28:09 bm750 user.debug kernel: out of order segment: rcv_next 81F3AF18 seq 81F3B9E0 - 81F3BF44



    Not sure if that is relevant.

  • Sorry I did get your PM but was a bit tied up yesterday! - you are using a fairly old version of Oscam, have you tried updating this? - sometimes if you get issues like this that become a mystery, then changing image or uninstalling and reinstalling your existing cam set up can cure it - you might not understand why it was wrong, but sometimes does the trick of fixing it. If you are worried about the amount of clients you have on your server, then maybe try to reduce these a bit - I have about half as much as you do and I get on ok - also look out for clients that take the piss.

    If I take a while to respond, you can see why.....


    :red:

  • Already have had a client cull.
    Did try updating to later version of oscam but for some reason my locals were not connecting.
    I noticed that in some versions of oscam additional files were added to the tuxbox folder.
    Currently I just use conf, server & user files.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!