Whats the difference between libusb-pcsc-ssl versions of Oscam

pretty sure all the above except .oscam-svn7917-x86_64-pc-linux-webif-libusb-ssl-Distribution.tar.gz are 32bit?

Quote from saadounesaid

what is the difference between these versions have the same issue (I'm on linux 12.04 64 bit with smargo 1)
. oscam-svn7917-i686-pc-linux-webif-libusb-Distribution.tar
. oscam-svn7917-i686-pc-linux-webif-pcsc-Distribution.tar
. oscam-svn7917-i686-pc-linux-webif-ssl-Distribution.tar
. oscam-svn7917-i686-pc-linux-webif-ssl-libusb-pcsc-Distribution.tar
.oscam-svn7917-x86_64-pc-linux-webif-libusb-ssl-Distribution.tar.gz
I currently use this version works well but I would like to update:
. oscam 1.20-unstable_svn build # 7849

Display More

I think its whats included support wise m8 libusb would be ok for smargo the PCSC is omniley etc. I always go for the longest one LOL so the 32bit libusb pcsc ssl one unless you want 64 bit then thats the last one. I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong.

Hi steve,
I dont think the last last will support pcsc (omnikey).
The 2nd the 4th for both would be for 32bit pcsc support
and the 4th should do as it will supports a few types..

Quote from annie12

Hi steve,
I dont think the last last will support pcsc (omnikey).
The 2nd the 4th for both would be for 32bit pcsc support
and the 4th should do as it will supports a few types..

Hi Annie12 I agree with you the clues are in the words as you say the last one is 64bit and doesn't mention PCSC. Was just trying to explain that to chap. As I said I always go for the lot then you are fairly sure the support is there. So I would take the last but one. Regards Steve