Posts by turner123

Quote from CyberCrime

I have setup a cacheex only vps and is running great. Only done this because the only version thats stable with cacheex is 6923.
The only problem with 6923 is my local cards do not like it glitching etc.
All new versions of Oscam work great with cacheex, no memory leaks and stuff. but there is a problem. when the loopback bug was fixed another bug turned up.
If you add more that 2 cacheex mode 3 exchanges the new versions will freeze on the cache, its like oscam can not keep up with the filtering of the cache and gives up.
So i have a cacheex only vps with 6923 and my local oscam can be the most up to date best of both as cache works perfect and as i only have 1 cacheex linked my local oscam works perfect
If anyone wants to join or test my cacheex server pm me.
Remember if you use mode 3 (the only mode i use) there is 0% hammering of cards as its only cache and nothing is sent to a card. But you might need a more powerfull server to keep up
on the user side (where you get the cache from) its best to lower the max hops to where you stop getting glitching, i have mine at 3 hops at the moment and is 100% glitch free (saying that you watch it go tits up lol)
10 hops works great 90+ cache hits but with glitching

Display More

im on version 7255 now pal what new version you on?

thanks caz, i have gone back to when i 1st did the server to versions i know was working but all are still chucking the error/warning up all i have done last few days was add 2 more shares thats it all was fine but im going through them adding them back 1 by 1 and seeing what one is causing the issue because when i limit it down to my own card its ok added another just now and all seems fine still so ill keep doing it as im all out of ideas, but what it looks like to me is shares kick in and my reader stops and ecm shoot through the roof and oscam gets all mixed up on what to do for the best :(

im not using any cacheEX now i have just installed oscam from a fresh install of ubuntu server and its still constantly doing it now :(

2012/08/14 08:36:55 9E764A8 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out2012/08/14 08:36:55 9EB3A48 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (WRITELOCK) timed out.2012/08/14 08:36:57 0 s WARNING lock clientlist_lock (WRITELOCK) timed out.
2012/08/14 08:36:57 9E83D50 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out2012/08/14 08:36:58 9E95248 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out2012/08/14 08:37:05 9EB5288 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (WRITELOCK) timed out.
2012/08/14 08:37:05 B7400468 h WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out.
2012/08/14 08:37:07 0 --- Skipped 3 duplicated log lines ---2012/08/14 08:37:07 0 s WARNING lock clientlist_lock (WRITELOCK) timed out.2012/08/14 08:37:08 9E7D888 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out.2012/08/14 08:37:09 0 --- Skipped 1 duplicated log lines ---2012/08/14 08:37:14 9EB3A48 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (WRITELOCK) timed out.
2012/08/14 08:37:15 9E83D50 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out.
2012/08/14 08:37:15 0 --- Skipped 1 duplicated log lines ---2012/08/14 08:37:17 0 s WARNING lock clientlist_lock (WRITELOCK) timed out2012/08/14 08:37:24 9E74460 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (WRITELOCK) timed out.2012/08/14 08:37:25 B7400468 h WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out

iv googled this error and its all in diff language and its only just started to come about, goin to re build the server tomorrow and use a older version of oscam

Hi im having some really bad issues tonight and server is constantly glitch im getting this in my logs i have never ever had any issues like this before

2012/08/13 22:56:54 859F5D0 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (WRITELOCK) timed out.
2012/08/13 22:56:56 0 s WARNING lock clientlist_lock (WRITELOCK) timed out.
2012/08/13 22:56:56 857A3C0 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out.
2012/08/13 22:56:56 8591760 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out.
2012/08/13 22:56:56 8574080 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out.
2012/08/13 22:56:56 857EE30 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out.
2012/08/13 22:56:56 858FF20 c WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out.
2012/08/13 22:56:56 B7400468 h WARNING lock clientlist_lock (READLOCK) timed out

its constantly happening and i have no idea why???

Also i few other things to take into account

if a user already shares with someone and then add them as a cacheEX aswel will this cause a loopback??

because it does so if you say have group of readers 1 2 3 4 5 then the user for the reader you add them to 1 2 3 4 5

so
reader group 1 = user 2 3 4 5
reader group 2 = user 1 3 4 5

if its not like that for normal share you get a loop back to there own server and causing high ecm

so for cacheEX user
user 50 (is share reader1)
cacheEX reader
reader 2 3 4 5

this them wont cause a loopback to someone you share with already (so i think)

so all your normal users will be 1 2 3 4 5 50
your share users will be 1 3 4 5 50 (not in there own group)

it is all very confusing bt has anyone else thought of this as all this is to prevent load on yours and others server but if your sticking them in all the same groups if you share and share cacheEX with a same person???

in theroy you might be best sharing cacheEX with someone thats not already sharing with you

i also posted a while back about setting up a vps for cacheEX only, who ever joins it sets theres to cacheEX-3 vps gets all cache and all users get in (theory a 1 stop shop for cache)

From my experiance of trying this a few times before and made a few mistakes i hammered other peoples cards (not knowing i was) so the settings have to be spot on if you have shares, dont get me wrong the cache was at 60-70% but the request on there side was huge

i personally think thats the fall for it too work 100% i put everything into there own groups then set send to all readers my cache was huge and like i said 60-70% was dealt with the cache and that was with only 1 cache user

to prevent the above i played around with the settings (back from what they was) and with just 1 cache user and normal cache im getting

1294 (8.93%) 1 cache user

so im guessing adding more cache users who have the same local cards will definately help the cacheEX

how i think it works if you have 5 cacheEX users and all for EG have 10 clients on each thats 50 ecms from clients say sly uk for instance, that will be a massive amount of cache and alot more will be dealt with the cacheEX therefore reducing the load on your card and your peers cards and your cacheEX cards

to me it looks a win win situation

the only thing i have noticed is that ecm from the local reader have dropped from a steady 90-100ms to sometimes 200ms but thats still very quick and thats not all the time

so in therory 50 clients spread out over 5 servers for EG (only) are not busy servers but them combined is in theroy making a busy server but actually in a very good way

this is just my 2 pence worth and ideas towards cacheEX as tbvh its not a straight cut understanding and everyone seems to have there own views on whats best and how its setup correctly

turner123

I dont use scripts or cron jobs for the reason above shuts down and dont restart or randon crashing etc, so thats why i installed ubuntu and installed (only) what i needed for the server, i manually restart it in a morning just to re fresh everything, but tbh longest i have had it online is 8 days and not a single problem

but i do understand people like to use cron jobs scripts and work for them

i guess its a personal preferance tbh

This is how i have mine setup with help from another user on here who has been working on this for quite sometime now

oscam version needs to be 6923 (memory leaks in newer versions)

i have groups 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 for eg, 1 being my local rest being shares

to setup cacheEX with someone
user group 50
reader 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Quote

[account]
user = cacheEX (what you set for your mate to use)
pwd = password (what you set for your mate to use)
group = 50 (cacheEX user always goes in its own group) (so another cacheEX will be group 51 and so on)
uniq = 3
cacheex = 3
cacheex_maxhop = 10
monlevel = 0
keepalive = 1
numusers = 0

Display More

Quote

[reader]
label = cacheex-user (can be anything you want
protocol = cccam
device = his-dyndns,port number (the user you share with addy)
user = CacheEX-3
password = password (password he sent you)
inactivitytimeout = 30
reconnecttimeout = 2
cacheex = 3
cacheex_maxhop = 10
group = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 (reader goes in all groups)
dropbadcws = 1
cccversion = 2.3.0
cccmaxhops = 0
cccmindown = 15
cccreconnect = 0
audisabled = 1

Display More

This is how i have mine set with the help of cybercrime for all thanks goes to him for looking into all this for some time now

copy paste this in either ssh winscp or webif all the ways i have shown you how to do it :)

never mind lol forum ### out bits lol

I did the server for him and there are no scripts and log size is set to 1000 its setup exactly the same as mine as in configs etc no scripts are running either

Quote from Eyeball1

hi just had to add the dns line but the ***box still wont connect still going from offline to login and back again so still no channels from an external network a had been searching the forums but was unable to find anything on this i will try harder lol

Reading ur post im now wondering wat im doing wrong then so do i not need cccam 2.1.3 then am i making work for myself lol

its a personal preferance on what you use tbh either cccam/oscam or oscam on its own, i did try cccam/oscam and found it ok but tbvh lfc pointed out a few things to me about just a oscam only server and i have not looked back it just seems so much better using the 1 (oscam)

some prefer cccam/oscam some dont some use csp some dont some use multics some dont, its personally upto the user etc what they prefer

add these 2 lines into oscam conf in the webif section

httpallowed = 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255
httpdyndns = your.no-ip.co.uk:port

im not 100% sure how to do it with the cccam as i only use oscam alone server&reader

EDIT :- Also if your trying to connect with a iphone/ipad/ipod etc safari wont open the webif of oscam, you will need a app called opera mini works perfect as i use it myself

i have done a few threads on here how to connect to the webif server etc from external network from idevices

Quote from birdman99

It's just oscam server I can't log into everything else is ok ie cccam server . I've checked the conf file and that's all editing ok .

is oscam running? have you chmod 755 oscam and added the correct line to rc.local for it to start upon booting the server??

Here is a pre edited opensc file when done the command in ssh/terminal nano and opened the opensc file hold down crtl and press and keep hold of K once deleted copy paste this in and crtl o enter crtl x

The above file was done by admin here, ten below or masterG cant remeber lol so thanks to them

only way setup a proxi reader cant have 2 servers reading/requesting for 1 card at same time other than what i have just suggested

[QUOTE
Note that if you check the status of the reader, it will say: NEEDINIT (0 of 0 card); thats normal. Behind the cacheEx-tab you will see if the cacheEx works.[/QUOTE]

thats were i went wrong i though it wasnt connected properly when i tried it cause said needinit, i did it from a dual bood but said connected on dual boot but needinit on main server side

if your on a server and its doing it every single hour on the hour.....kinda looks to me as the server owner has maybe set a script and cron job to restart server every hour on the hour......could be an error on the server owners side thinking he has set it for say every day???

EDIT as 7 seconds does look to me as oscam is being restarted, or have you got a script/cron job on the box running?? to say reset can every hour???

all i can think of

other than that does it do it on a fta channel if so could be your own side if it dont then its the server end not you

Quote from thatfellow

Yeah, well as long as there are mugs to pay, payservers will prosper.. Although one thing to take from that is that CSP must do exactly what it says on the tin if payservers are using it.

Have you seen this tut for configuring CSP:
http://linuxsat-support.com/cs…rial-how-install-csp.html

Not the most user-friendly software I've come across!

yea thats what i went off installing but hit problems etc so had to use google to find work arounds and got there in the end, but iv not fully finnished it yet its just sat there waiting to be finnished lol, just not bothered lol yet lol