Fantastic: thinking cause the CAM is 4K will create problem !! ...but as I say was my personal think !
Posts by benhur
-
-
personally I think this must be impossible , because the Gb 800 se dont support the CI+ !!
-
The oscam crashing after add a newcamd reader !
OSCam-11726-799 (armv7ve libusb OpenSSL-3.x.x)can you try with : CAMD35 Or CCcam
For newcamd i have never used it .
#########
Note that OSCam need a lot of work to support OpenSSL-3.x.x Correctly...
with every image you need to install oscam that matches OpenSSL in image ..
because Symlinks are not really good for OSCam ...etc
Thanks,
My friend all is working fine on OpenPli OpenSSL-1.1.1 , so because i like OSCam's made by samur I switched to Openpli !!!
-
CAMD35 Or CCcam is OK ::
-
Post #1 in page #1 Updated .
Hi my friend samur : I was waiting for a new version to be released to report a problem ..same problem with the old release !
The oscam crashing after add a newcamd reader !
OSCam-11726-799 (armv7ve libusb OpenSSL-3.x.x)
Code
Display More18:00:25 00000000 s (main) http thread started 18:00:25 00000000 s (main) starting thread reader check 18:00:25 00000000 s (main) reader check thread started 18:00:25 00000000 s (main) starting thread cw_process 18:00:25 00000000 s (main) cw_process thread started 18:00:25 00000000 s (reader) cardreader: Initializing 18:00:25 00000000 s (reader) New-183E [newcamd] creating thread for device 10.8.0.8 18:00:25 00000000 s (work) start reader thread action 8 18:00:25 00000000 s (main) starting thread client work 18:00:25 00000000 s (main) client work thread started 18:00:25 00000000 s (stat) loadbalancer: could not open /tmp/.oscam/stat for reading (errno=2 No such file or directory) 18:00:25 00000000 s (main) waiting for local card init 18:00:25 660DE6F2 r (work) data from add_job action=8 client r New-183E 18:00:25 660DE6F2 p (newcamd) proxy 10.8.0.8:20022 newcamd525 (fd=0) 18:00:25 660DE6F2 p (reader) New-183E [newcamd] proxy initialized, server 10.8.0.8:20022 18:00:25 660DE6F2 p (work) add reader job action 1 queue length 1 New-183E 18:00:25 660DE6F2 p (reader) 10.8.0.8: resolved ip=10.8.0.8 18:00:25 660DE6F2 p (reader) New-183E [newcamd] connecting to 10.8.0.8:20022 18:00:25 660DE6F2 p (reader) New-183E [newcamd] TRACE: socket open fd=4 18:00:25 6EBD0161 h (webif) webif: decompressed 164906 bytes back into 404104 bytes 18:00:25 6EBD0161 h (webif) HTTP Server running. ip=0.0.0.0 port=8888 18:00:26 660DE6F2 p (reader) New-183E [newcamd] TRACE: connect successful fd=4 18:00:26 660DE6F2 p (newcamd) server init sequence: 18:00:26 660DE6F2 p (newcamd) 80 6C EB 9F 5A 3C AA CB 76 79 52 93 02 85 root@pulse4k:~#
-
Screenshot 2023-12-03 180549.png
First : ) I hope than the Egami Softcam supporter send thanks to samur than created this fantastic EMU !
Second : ) Why this fashion of renaming, when the work belongs to others !
Third : ) The pastebin inside the oscam.server does not work !
samur does it as a hobby, I guess he deserves thanks!!
Hi, I deleted that version from the addons.
We at Egami have no problem citing sources, the source is written in the logs or webif.
Do you think Egami is a business and not a hobby?
So should I contact all the teams that use my public plugins and ask them to cite the source?
You could have spared this observation, in my opinion!
Friend was not directed to the coder or who is working to this beutiful image ;but on the list I see corrected other versions example; oscam by mohaned ecc ecc , usualy we see on other plugins ; by kidac , by madhouse ecc ecc so why not : oscam http by samur ?..the second think was the paste link is down …all here no bad thinks !
-
Screenshot 2023-12-03 180549.png
First : ) I hope than the Egami Softcam supporter send thanks to samur than created this fantastic EMU !
Second : ) Why this fashion of renaming, when the work belongs to others !
Third : ) The pastebin inside the oscam.server does not work !
samur does it as a hobby, I guess he deserves thanks!!
-
samur thank you for all you do for us. My first idea was, let's create a oscam than give to all the possibility to update on hide mode, to not make keys on public ecc ecc, unfortunally as you see, people still asking for keys or link on public. Me and my friends are logging frequentely and we suposed than soon the emm will change every 3 days and this will make the work very hard. So we think than will be better, also if is possible, create ( from you ) a new oscam with the link incorporated but hiden. We must organize 2 different team as HD and Piterfree team to update frequentely the new emm but no more pastebin or link on pubblic. I think than is not inteligent posting keys on pubblic, is better working on underground... Can you please do this new release and give to us another great help.
Thank you!
Underground? Nonsense. None of those keys exposing your card in particular. It's easy to automate it by scripts and automatically update some txt file on some cheap web hosting. What is so hard in this? Of course, if you doing it all manually...
Ok @dimman you are free to post your personal keys and make them pubblic..
-
samur thank you for all you do for us. My first idea was, let's create a oscam than give to all the possibility to update on hide mode, to not make keys on public ecc ecc, unfortunally as you see, people still asking for keys or link on public. Me and my friends are logging frequentely and we suposed than soon the emm will change every 3 days and this will make the work very hard. So we think than will be better, also if is possible, create ( from you ) a new oscam with the link incorporated but hiden. We must organize 2 different team as HD and Piterfree team to update frequentely the new emm but no more pastebin or link on pubblic. I think than is not inteligent posting keys on pubblic, is better working on underground... Can you please do this new release and give to us another great help.
Thank you!
-
https://XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx
CLOSED !!
Perhaps we don't realize the danger of posting a key in public that exposes encrypted programs. In my opinion, they are already very generous in not sending "La Finanza" knocking on your door!! A lot has been done (thanks @ samur above all) to keep key strings and urls out of the forums but, unfortunately, many don't understand it, and I'm also surprised that someone hasn't had a knock on the door yet!
Here we are all risking:
Admins
Supporters
Donors
Simple members
The forum itself!!
-
hi
With : oscam-11725-798.armv7ve-libusb
open pli 8.3
error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 3 06:16 /usr/lib/libssh2.so.1 -> libssh2.so.1.0.1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 182448 Aug 1 06:31 /usr/lib/libssh2.so.1.0.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Nov 3 09:07 /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 -> /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 246204 Jun 14 2017 /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Nov 3 09:07 /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 297412 Jun 13 2021 /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 405624 Aug 1 06:08 /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1
help me :)
now :lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jan 1 1970 /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 -> /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 246204 Jun 14 2017 /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Jan 1 1970 /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 297412 Jun 13 2021 /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 405624 Aug 1 06:08 /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Nov 3 18:06 /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 -> /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Jan 1 1970 /usr/lib/libcrypt.so.2 -> libcrypt.so.2.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 197952 Aug 1 06:08 /usr/lib/libcrypt.so.2.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Jan 1 1970 /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 -> /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Jan 1 1970 /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 -> /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Jan 1 1970 /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1390960 Jun 13 2021 /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1841360 Aug 1 06:08 /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Nov 3 18:12 /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.3 -> /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.1
/usr/lib/libssl.so.3: version `OPENSSL_3.0.0' not found
:(
suggestions ?
use this oscam friend :
-
for armv7ve OpenSSL-3.x.x I need it for armv7ve is indiferent the image we use !
-
With the above configuration it doesn't update the gold card for me, why?
Use oscam from: Post #67 because those from Post #1, page #1 not complete.
;
Hello samur : can you please re compile for armv7ve OpenSSL-3.x.x : because is not present on Post #67 and me too have problem to update with the first on Post #1 !
Thank you !
-
samur Is this oscam-emu addon publicly available so we can compile our oscam versions ourselves with simplebuild (https://github.com/gorgone/s3_releases/) ?. I've an old raspberry pi 1B (armv6) being compiled with usb/smargo reader support... always difficult to find the correct oscam for my hw.
Hi mysat2 ( and all others ) me to have a problem with my Ubuntu ( the oscam crash for some reason ) but is not necessary to have the last from samur on all devices , you need to have it on one receiver ( mipsel arm ecc ecc ) also from some remote friendly receiver ; just set the correct configuration to the reader than you have 183E and set the dvbapi for update for this remote reader as the last oscam from samur is capable to send the https EMM gived to all local+remote readers !
-
I confirm EMM is OK : I'm updating my cards from client and on local also is working fine .
-
...no chance : ...no problem my friend !!
18:12:03 7938ECC0 h (reader) HD+186A [mouse] Restarting reader
18:12:03 7938ECC0 h (reader) HD+186A [mouse] creating thread for device /dev/Stinger02
18:12:03 7938ECC0 h (webif) reader HD+186A enabled by WebIf
18:12:04 2FEBF804 r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] Reader initialized (device=/dev/Stinger02, detect=cd, mhz=369, cardmhz=369)
18:12:04 2FEBF804 r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] card detected
18:12:06 2FEBF804 r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] ATR: 3F FF XX XX ....... 30 17
18:12:06 2FEBF804 r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] Setting baudrate to 115312 bps
18:12:06 2FEBF804 r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] detected card (Merlin) in CAK7 mode
18:12:07 2FEBF804 r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] Rom revision: DNASP420 RevS60
/OSCam-SaMuR/OSCam-SaMuR: symbol lookup error: /OSCam-SaMuR/OSCam-SaMuR: undefined symbol: MDC2_Init, version OPENSSL_3.0.0
-
what image are you using? ...if the oscam starts you do everything from webiff which is much simpler
-
samur I don't know why, but I have this curious error on my Ubuntu which only happens when I start the READER with the HD+ 186A card!
( All the rest is working fine 183D , 183E , 0500 ecc ecc !
20:09:49 0BDE263E r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] Reader initialized (device=/dev/Stinger02, detect=cd, mhz=369, cardmhz=369)
20:09:49 0BDE263E r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] card detected
20:09:50 0BDE263E r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] ATR: 3F XX XX .............. 30 17
20:09:50 0BDE263E r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] Setting baudrate to 115312 bps
20:09:50 0BDE263E r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] detected card (Merlin) in CAK7 mode
20:09:51 0BDE263E r (reader) HD+186A [mouse] Rom revision: DNASP420 RevS60
/OSCam-SaMuR/OSCam-SaMuR: symbol lookup error: /OSCam-SaMuR/OSCam-SaMuR: undefined symbol: EVP_mdc2, version OPENSSL_3.0.0
-
Many thanks for your answer, the procedure in your TV was made by Sat or Terrestrial?
only by SAT ... some weeks ago my CAM starting update it self when I go to rai YoYo HD : I leave it 30 min about , after reinit CAM the new software was installed !
-
Yes I confirm , all OK now and I like it : xxxxx 04EB8 written http emm !!